Azerbaijan-Türkiye alignment at centre of Macron border controversy

Azerbaijan-Türkiye alignment at centre of Macron border controversy
France's President Emmanuel Macron and Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan attend an official welcoming ceremony in Yerevan, Armenia, 5 May, 2026.
Reuters

Reports that Emmanuel Macron planned to cross from Armenia into Türkiye via their closed border - and was reportedly blocked following consultations with Azerbaijan - have sparked renewed debate on South Caucasus diplomacy.

According to Azerbaijani media outlets, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan refused to allow the crossing after discussions with Baku.

Macron visited Yerevan from 3 to 5 May to attend several events and was reportedly considering what sources described as a “politically symbolic” journey into Türkiye through the closed border.

Sources claimed the proposal had initially been coordinated with certain Turkish representatives but was later rejected following Ankara–Baku consultations.

The reports suggested Macron hoped the move would strengthen his diplomatic standing at a time when French foreign policy has faced criticism over developments in Africa, the Middle East and Ukraine.

'Strategic alignment is key'

Speaking on AnewZ’s Daybreak programme on Thursday, Sultan Zahidov, a leading adviser at the Centre of Analysis of International Relations (AIR Centre), said the reported refusal reflected strategic coordination between Ankara and Baku.

“Recep Tayyip Erdoğan did not give green light for Macron's crossing Armenian-Turkish border from Armenia. We know that the borders have been closed for over 30 years. And perhaps Emmanuel Macron had a plan to make a politically symbolic gesture by travelling to Türkiye from Armenia through the closed borders,” Zahidov said.

He added that Türkiye’s approach to normalisation with Armenia remains closely connected to developments between Baku and Yerevan.

Zahidov also said France should reassess its regional policy, arguing that it must account for “Azerbaijan-Türkiye strategic alignment, which is key.”

EU engagement and regional realities

On Prime Time, AnewZ Deputy Editor-in-Chief Orkhan Amashov discussed the role of European institutions in shaping narratives around the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process.

“European Parliament adopted 14 resolutions about the Armenian peace process in a unilaterally unquestioningly pro Armenian style accusing Azerbaijan of all sorts of things… And of course naturally those resolutions did not benefit peace process in any reasonable way,” he stated.

Amashov argued that such positions, along with debates over post-conflict issues including displaced populations and legal cases, have added complexity to the peace agenda.

He stressed that despite increased EU engagement with Yerevan, Azerbaijan remains central to regional transport and connectivity frameworks.

Transit cooperation expands

Meanwhile, economic and transit cooperation between Azerbaijan and Armenia continues to develop.

Azerbaijan Railways told Report that a new shipment from Russia to Armenia will pass through Azerbaijani territory, consisting of aluminium and grain cargo. This marks the first known transit of aluminium to Armenia via Azerbaijan.

Earlier shipments included fertilisers and grain transported from Russia to Armenia through Azerbaijan.

Zahidov described the transit developments as a practical step towards normalisation.

“This is definitely a milestone achievement. And it indicates the fact that Azerbaijan is not just committed to peace on paper. Azerbaijan is taking practical, real steps,” he said.

Armenia-Türkiye dialogue described as 'excellent'

Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan described relations with Türkiye in positive terms during the Yerevan Dialogue 2026 forum.

“We have excellent dialogue with Türkiye,” he said.

He referred to ongoing cooperation, including efforts to restore the Ani Bridge and discussions on reopening the Gyumri-Kars railway link.

Mirzoyan said both sides have expressed readiness to establish diplomatic relations and eventually fully open the border, while noting that it currently remains closed except for limited categories such as diplomats and third-country nationals.

Elections and political uncertainty

Despite signs of growing cooperation, analysts say major political challenges remain unresolved.

Zahidov pointed to Armenia’s upcoming parliamentary elections and constitutional debates as potential risks for the normalisation process.

“And the outcomes of these elections matter as well. Who will be in power after these elections matters as well, because this outcome can dramatically shift the foreign policy of Armenia, and thereby the regional geopolitical dynamics as well,” he said.

He also warned that if more hardline political forces gain influence in Armenia, the current transition from confrontation towards stability in the South Caucasus could face renewed pressure.

Tags