U.S. and China at odds over Middle East war and Hormuz strategy

U.S. and China at odds over Middle East war and Hormuz strategy
U.S. President and Chinese President walk as they leave after a bilateral meeting at Gimhae International Airport in Busan, South Korea, 30 October, 2025.
Reuters

The war in the Middle East is exposing deeper tensions between the United States and China, particularly over control of global energy routes. As the Strait of Hormuz becomes a focal point, both powers are revealing sharply contrasting strategic priorities.

Washington has pushed for an international naval coalition to secure the passage, framing it as a shared global responsibility. Beijing, however, has adopted a more cautious stance, refusing to deploy warships and instead calling for an immediate halt to military operations.

China has extended emergency aid to Iran, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq as the conflict worsens, while Beijing and Moscow have called for talks amid rising tensions.

Speaking to AnewZ, Andrew Leung, an international and independent China strategist, stressed Beijing’s position: “This war is not China’s war… China wants to keep the oil flowing, does not want the region destabilised, but it is not sufficient to coerce China into becoming involved.”

Leung noted that China’s energy imports are diversified and that Beijing prefers diplomacy and stability over military involvement. He also highlighted broader geopolitical calculations, arguing that China is focused on protecting its economic interests rather than aligning with U.S.-led military efforts.

Complexity of U.S.–China relations

Experts underline the long-standing complexities of bilateral ties, with one noting that “the relationship between the United States and China has had many ups and downs”, shaped by disputes over trade, technology and regional influence.

Professor Ivani Vassoler added that the conflict has also affected President Trump’s planned visit to Beijing, explaining that the trip was postponed because of “events in the Middle East, particularly the war on Iran”, illustrating how immediate crises intersect with long-term diplomatic priorities.

As the conflict continues, both countries are walking a fine line, balancing strategic interests, global responsibilities and the risks of deeper confrontation. The crisis is no longer just about the Middle East, but also reflects a broader power struggle between Washington and Beijing.

Tags