A fragile EU–U.S. trade deal is under strain following U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff threats over Greenland. European leaders are now forced to weigh up not only their immediate response but also what a deeper trade confrontation could entail.
Tensions intensified after the European Parliament (EP) signalled it was preparing to suspend approval of the deal. On Wednesday (21 January) the Parliament, the European Union's legislative body, suspended work on the deal:
"Given the continued and escalating threats, including tariff threats, against Greenland and Denmark, and their European allies, we have been left with no alternative but to suspend work" on the agreement, said Bernd Lange, the chairman of the EP's Committee on International Trade.
What was agreed?
Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached the agreement setting new terms for EU–U.S. trade on 27 July 2025, describing it as the first step towards a broader, long-term framework.
The deal was intended to restore stability and predictability for businesses, secure EU access to the U.S. market, protect integrated value chains and jobs, and deepen cooperation on economic security and supply chains.
Both sides agreed to coordinate on steel, aluminium and copper overcapacity, reduce tariffs through quotas, and lower non-tariff barriers. A U.S. tariff ceiling of 15 percent was agreed for "most EU exports."
U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, in Turnberry, Scotland, UK, July 27, 2025.
Reuters
Trump tariff threat
However, the deal was tested within months, with Trump linking trade relations to a broader geopolitical dispute over Greenland.
Trump has warned the trade truce could unravel, saying the U.S. could impose escalating tariffs unless it is allowed to buy Greenland, home to about 57,000 people.
He said the measures could take effect from 1 February, naming EU members Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland, as well as the UK and Norway.
Trump initially declined to say whether he would use force to seize Greenland, but dismissed the presence of NATO allies on the island, saying “that wasn’t a military” and that “they sent a few people… to guard against Russia.”
European leaders rejected his position. Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said: “We are living in 2026. You can trade with people, but you don’t trade people.”
Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said the territory must decide its own future, adding: “We will not let ourselves be pressured. We stand firm on dialogue, on respect and on international law.”
What will the EU do next?
EU leaders are due to discuss next steps on Greenland at an emergency summit in Brussels on Thursday (22 January). Any decision will require consensus among the bloc’s 27 member states — a process that can be politically slow and complex.
One option remains a package of tariffs on €93 billion ($109 billion) worth of U.S. imports, announced last year in response to Trump’s 'Liberation Day' tariffs, but put on hold during negotiations.
That reprieve expires on 6 February 2026, meaning EU levies could take effect the following day unless extended or replaced by approval of the deal.
Another option, being pushed by French President, Emmanuel Macron, is the Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI). It has never been used and could restrict access to public tenders, investments or banking activity, or limit trade in services — an area where the U.S. runs a surplus with the EU, including in digital services. The instrument is designed to respond to economic pressure only as a last resort.
Macron has urged the EU to consider its retaliatory tools, saying Washington’s “endless accumulation” of tariffs was “fundamentally unacceptable,” especially when used as leverage against territorial sovereignty.
Retaliation: what leverage does the EU have?
If tensions escalate further, the EU has a defined, but tightly constrained, set of tools under the ACI. It allows restrictions on imports and exports of goods and services, as well as measures affecting intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. It could also limit access to the EU market - including public procurement - tighten chemical and sanitary rules, or restrict access to EU funding.
In theory, retaliation could target politically-sensitive pressure points. These range from U.S. products closely associated with Republican states, such as Kentucky bourbon, to sectors aligned with Trump’s support base, including crypto and Silicon Valley.
Other potential levers include areas the U.S. relies on abroad. For example, insulin imports from Denmark, or European-made weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy, though EU officials have cautioned that such measures would be highly sensitive and politically difficult.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen framed the moment as part of a broader shift in global trade, warning that “geopolitical shocks can and must serve as an opportunity for Europe” and calling it “a necessity to build a new form of European independence.”
She said Europe was choosing “fair trade over tariffs, partnership over isolation,” while remaining committed to “de-risking our economies and diversifying our supply chains.”
Despite the range of options, EU diplomats say political appetite for aggressive retaliation remains limited, with most member states wary of triggering a full-scale trade war and preferring targeted, proportionate and temporary measures, particularly given the need for consensus among the bloc’s 27 members.
The European Union and Washington are nearing an agreement to coordinate the production and security of critical minerals, Bloomberg News reported on Friday (10 April).
Donald Trump has warned that countries providing military weapons to Iran could face sweeping new tariffs, in a move that risks escalating economic tensions despite a recent ceasefire.
Colombia’s commerce minister, Diana Marcela Morales, has said she will propose raising tariffs on certain Ecuadorian goods from 30% to 50%, as a trade dispute between the neighbouring countries intensifies.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest State of the Union address set out a second-term agenda built on economic protectionism, military strength and a hard line on Iran, signalling a strategy that pairs diplomatic engagement with firm red lines, Assoc. Prof. Orkhan Valiyev told AnewZ Daybreak.
A preliminary round of Lebanon-Israel talks has concluded in Washington, marking a tentative diplomatic step as regional tensions rise. The development comes as the United States launches a naval blockade of Iranian ports.
Greenland’s prime minister has appointed his predecessor to oversee foreign affairs, as pressure from Washington intensifies over the Arctic island’s future.
Spain’s plan to grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants is facing early resistance, with immigration officers warning they may strike over a lack of preparation and resources.
The U.S. and Iran could resume peace talks over the next couple of days, U.S. President Donald Trump has said. Talks between Israel and Lebanon were held in Washington yesterday. Fuel prices have dropped below $100 a barrel. U.S. blockade on Iranian ports completes first day.
A now-deleted artificial intelligence (AI) generated image by the U.S. President has sparked immense backlash across the political divide. It comes as Trump and the Pope continue their fued over the U.S.-led war in the Middle East.
France is set to vote on a controversial law targeting what it calls “new forms” of antisemitism, sparking sharp divisions and raising concerns over free speech, criticism of Israel and the protection of Jewish communities.
Hungary’s election winner, Péter Magyar, said on Wednesday his cabinet could be sworn in by mid-May, with Magyar taking office as prime minister, and pledged swift action to unlock billions in suspended European Union funding.
A former NATO chief and senior figure the UK's ruling Labour Party has launched a sharp attack on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, accusing his government of failing to adequately fund defence.
Russia has signalled it is ready to increase energy supplies to China, underscoring deepening ties between the two powers ahead of an expected visit by President Vladimir Putin.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment