Azerbaijan tells Russia to stop linking Armenia ties to Baku
Moscow should stop linking Russia-Armenia relations to Azerbaijan, Baku's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Aykhan Hajizada has said, after Russia again r...
China has condemned new UK sanctions against two Chinese companies accused of supplying materials used by Russia's military, calling the measures illegal and warning of possible retaliation if they are not lifted.
China has formally objected to sanctions imposed by the United Kingdom on Chinese companies accused of supplying materials to Russia that have been used in its military operations. Beijing has rejected the measures as illegal, warned of retaliation, and called on London to lift the restrictions immediately.
The UK government sanctioned two Chinese entities over claims they supplied drone components and other military materials to Russia. China's embassy in London responded sharply, saying Beijing firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions, which it argues lack a basis in international law and harm the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises.
China said it had lodged what it described as "solemn representations" with the UK and warned it would take forceful measures to safeguard those interests.
Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United Kingdom, alongside the U.S. and the European Union, has imposed successive rounds of sanctions designed to cut Russia off from the technology and financial systems it needs to sustain its war effort.
Western governments have consistently identified China as a key route through which restricted goods continue to reach Russia, often through intermediary companies operating in the electronics and technology distribution sectors.
The goods at the centre of the dispute include drone components, semiconductors and other electronic parts that have both civilian and military applications. Western officials say Russian entities have been paying companies outside Russia to purchase restricted materials from Western suppliers under the cover of civilian use before transferring them to Russia after delivery.
The two Chinese entities named by the UK have been accused of being part of that supply chain, whether knowingly or otherwise.
Beijing argues that its companies are engaged in entirely normal and legitimate commercial activity and that the UK has no legal right to penalise them for trading with Russia.
China has described such measures as a typical example of unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction", arguing that they undermine the international trading system, impede normal economic and trade exchanges, and damage the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains.
China's embassy in London was clear about what Beijing expects next: the UK must immediately correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions against the relevant Chinese entities.
The warning that China would take forceful measures if that did not happen was not elaborated upon, but Beijing has a range of options available, from retaliatory trade measures to restrictions on UK companies operating in China.
China has maintained throughout the conflict that it is a neutral party working towards peace and that it has strictly regulated the export of dual-use goods. Beijing's position was stated plainly by its embassy in London: normal exchanges and cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted or affected.
That statement captures the heart of the disagreement. What China describes as normal business activity, the UK views as sanctions evasion.
Both sides have drawn their lines, and neither is showing any sign of backing down. With China–UK relations only recently beginning to improve after years of strain, the timing of London's decision has not gone unnoticed in Beijing.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that there is a good chance” of reaching a deal with Iran, but warned that Washington would resume military operation if negotiations fail.
Iran will halt its own attacks as long as the United States maintains its pause on strikes, but Tehran remains sceptical of U.S. intentions, a senior Iranian source told on Sunday.
The Russia-Ukraine war is increasingly reshaping the Caspian region. From threats to energy infrastructure to renewed diplomatic efforts, countries across the region are adapting to the wider consequences of a conflict that continues to disrupt trade, transport and security.
A New York school district has put plans to introduce a humanoid robot into classrooms on hold after fierce criticism from teachers, Indigenous community members and state education officials over the use of artificial intelligence in schools.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed laws introducing stricter financial requirements for foreign workers, as Moscow continues to tighten migration controls affecting millions of labour migrants, particularly from Central Asia.
Meteorologists in China have used a swarm of drones to observe Typhoon Noul as it passed through Guangdong province, aiming to improve weather monitoring and forecasting during extreme storms.
Tehran has stressed that its commercial vessel hit by a Ukrainian drone in the Caspian Sea on Saturday was carrying only civilian cargo and vowed to respond appropriately while holding Kyiv responsible for the attack.
Since 1946, nine people have served as UN Secretary-General, the closest thing the world has to a chief diplomat. The role carries no army and little hard power, yet its occupants have shaped how nations respond to war, famine and global crises. Here are five who left the deepest mark.
Two shallow earthquakes hit a remote area of China's Qinghai province on Tuesday, with authorities reporting no casualties or collapsed buildings so far.
Australia is considering building its first new oil refinery in more than six decades as conflict in the Middle East exposes the country's heavy reliance on imported fuel.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment