Lavrov’s Karabakh Comments Reveal Strained Russia–Armenia Ties

Moscow once counted on Armenia as a loyal regional partner. Now, as relations sour, Russia appears willing to rewrite its own role in the Karabakh conflict.

When Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently spoke in Yerevan about the use of Russian weapons in the occupation of Azerbaijani territories, his words may have seemed like a surprising admission. In reality, they revealed something deeper — the growing rift between Russia and Armenia’s current government.

Lavrov pointed out that Armenia had used Russian-supplied arms not only in the Karabakh war but also to build defensive lines across seven districts that Yerevan had never officially claimed.

Lavrov’s comments came not as part of an open reckoning, but at a moment when Moscow is visibly frustrated with Armenia’s political direction under Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Analysts say the remarks reflect Russia’s shifting strategy. For years, Armenia served as a reliable partner in the South Caucasus — a country deeply aligned with Moscow, supported militarily and diplomatically, and often used as a counterweight to Western and Turkish influence in the region.

Throughout that period, Russia avoided publicly discussing its own enabling role in the first Karabakh war or acknowledging how its arms shaped the battlefield. But now, with Armenia distancing itself from the Kremlin, those same talking points have become politically convenient.

This is not just a change in rhetoric — it's a revealing moment of double standards.

Lavrov’s comments appear to be part of a broader pressure campaign. Russia has continued to back opposition figures tied to Armenia’s former administrations — such as Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan — and recently appointed Sergey Kiriyenko to oversee relations with Armenia. That move, along with renewed contacts with the so-called “Karabakh clan,” signals Moscow’s preference for more compliant political actors.

The relationship began shifting in earnest after Armenia’s 2018 Velvet Revolution, which brought Pashinyan to power on promises of reform and independence from oligarchic and foreign influence. Since then, Armenia has taken cautious steps to realing itself on the foreign political scene.

Pashinyan’s recent declaration that “there will be no new war” between Armenia and Azerbaijan was read by many as a direct signal to both domestic and international audiences that Armenia will no longer be drawn into cycles of escalation — especially not on Moscow’s terms.

Observers argue that Russia’s old playbook — using loyal allies, controlling conflict narratives, and leveraging military dependency — is increasingly out of step with the South Caucasus’ evolving political landscape. Calls for sovereignty, peace, and long-term development are growing, and Russia’s attempts to reassert control through public rebukes and selective memory may no longer work.

Copied