The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
Recent operations by the U.S. military have led some to believe that a decapitating strike is a silver bullet capable of fixing any foreign policy problem swiftly. However, this logic is flawed, and the risks of relying on swift, targeted actions are too great to ignore.
For an extended period, American foreign policy revolved around the idea of strategic containment, including sanctions, deterrence, and diplomatic pressure. With Donald Trump returning to the White House, the U.S. adopted a new National Security Strategy that embraced a realism-driven policy approach.
A few weeks later, the U.S. launched Operation Absolute Resolve, resulting in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The operation was carried out in two stages. First, the U.S. Armed Forces struck Venezuelan infrastructure to suppress air defenses. Parallel to this, a dedicated task force launched an attack on Maduro’s compound, seizing the Venezuelan leader and his wife.
Fast forward to February 27, 2026, the U.S. and Israel launched a coordinated joint attack targeting Iran. On the first day of the operation, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in an air strike. In theory, the strike represented another successful example of decapitation.
However, in practice, things are far more complicated. The conflict continues, and the Iranian military retains operational capacity, striking the U.S. and Israeli assets in the Middle East. Unlike in Venezuela, the operation in Iran did not end in a swift victory, showing that removing a leader does not automatically dismantle a state’s military capabilities.
Several factors explain the variation in these two cases. First, Venezuela boasts modest military resources and capabilities compared to Iran. Tehran has developed domestic drone and missile programs, coupled with years of preparation for potential confrontation with Israel and the U.S. These factors provided Iran with a higher level of resilience compared to Venezuela.
Regime structure and ideology are other variables explaining the variance in the outcome. In contrast to Venezuela, the Iranian political system is vastly different, with institutions playing a more prominent role in policymaking.
The Assembly of Experts elects a successor to maintain political continuity. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) protects leadership and holds significant influence across military, political, and economic affairs. The Guardian Council oversees candidates and ensures ideological consistency.
These institutions create a safety net and ensure Iran is not dependent on a single individual, maintaining cohesion even after the Supreme Leader’s death.
Relying purely on decapitation strikes presents significant risks. One major issue is the unpredictable response. Iranian forces continue to strike regional targets, highlighting strategic uncertainty. Another problem is regional escalation; removing leaders can trigger chaos, prolonging conflicts and creating instability.
Finally, decapitation strikes may produce a “rally-around-the-flag” effect, where foreign attacks boost domestic support for the regime rather than weaken it.
Policymakers must avoid treating decapitation strikes as a one-size-fits-all solution. Success depends on the adversary’s institutional resilience, military capability, and strategic context. Removing a leader may bring short-term gains but rarely ensures lasting political stability.
Decapitation strikes are merely one tool in the foreign policy toolbox, not a guarantee of victory.
The U.S. military began a blockade of Iran's ports on Monday, President Donald Trump said, and Tehran threaten...
A now-deleted artificial intelligence (AI) generated image by the U.S. President has sparked immense backlash across the political divide. It ...
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief. Here are th...
Authorities in China have launched an investigation into a wave of online bullying targeting Olympic diving champion Quan Hongchan, as concerns gro...
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has refused to join a U.S.-led blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, distancing Britain from military escalation after f...
The United Nations Security Council did not fail because it was silent after the war against Iran began on 28 February 2026.
In times of geopolitical upheaval, nuance is often the first casualty. Complex realities are reduced to convenient narratives and countries caught in the crosscurrents of regional tensions find themselves portrayed through a single, often misleading lens.
In the Middle East, wars rarely remain confined to battlefields. Their most profound and enduring consequences are often measured not in military victories but in human displacement.
What has unfolded in northern Syria recently is not the dramatic defeat of a community, nor a humanitarian parable of “betrayal”. It reflects a familiar pattern in Middle Eastern geopolitics: the quiet removal of a proxy whose strategic usefulness has expired.
Israel has reprimanded Spain’s most senior diplomat in Tel Aviv after a giant effigy of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was blown up in a Spanish town.
U.S. President Donald Trump warned that any Iranian ships approaching ports in the Strait of Hormuz would be "immediately eliminated" on Monday, as the U.S. started its blockade.
Nine suspects were arrested on Saturday (11 April) in connection with a terror attack targeting a police post in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district.
Millions of Orthodox Christians across the globe celebrated Easter, known as Holy Pascha, on Sunday (12 April) with midnight liturgies, candlelight processions and deeply rooted local traditions reflecting centuries of faith.
Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry said on Sunday that talks with Pakistan had been positive, while Türkiye stressed the importance of stronger ties between Kabul and Islamabad.
At a time of deepening global polarisation, rising conflict and shrinking space for dialogue, Pakistan is stepping into a historic role. Diplomatic engagements in Islamabad, bringing together regional powers amid the Iran crisis, signal both urgency and opportunity.
Eurasia is no longer a passive space shaped by great powers but an active arena of contestation involving multiple overlapping conflicts and competing connectivity projects.
Global oil prices rose sharply in early 2026, with Brent crude exceeding $100 per barrel in mid-March after disruptions in the Middle East and heightened risks in the Strait of Hormuz.
Some geographies are small on the map yet immense in history. The Strait of Hormuz is one. About a quarter of global oil trade and a fifth of LNG flows pass through this narrow corridor - around 20 million barrels per day sustaining the global system.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “buy” Greenland was initially presented as an eccentricity. It was not. Nor is the growing U.S. interest in strategic access points to Antarctica.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment