The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
Recent operations by the U.S. military have led some to believe that a decapitating strike is a silver bullet capable of fixing any foreign policy problem swiftly. However, this logic is flawed, and the risks of relying on swift, targeted actions are too great to ignore.
For an extended period, American foreign policy revolved around the idea of strategic containment, including sanctions, deterrence, and diplomatic pressure. With Donald Trump returning to the White House, the U.S. adopted a new National Security Strategy that embraced a realism-driven policy approach.
A few weeks later, the U.S. launched Operation Absolute Resolve, resulting in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The operation was carried out in two stages. First, the U.S. Armed Forces struck Venezuelan infrastructure to suppress air defenses. Parallel to this, a dedicated task force launched an attack on Maduro’s compound, seizing the Venezuelan leader and his wife.
Fast forward to February 27, 2026, the U.S. and Israel launched a coordinated joint attack targeting Iran. On the first day of the operation, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in an air strike. In theory, the strike represented another successful example of decapitation.
However, in practice, things are far more complicated. The conflict continues, and the Iranian military retains operational capacity, striking the U.S. and Israeli assets in the Middle East. Unlike in Venezuela, the operation in Iran did not end in a swift victory, showing that removing a leader does not automatically dismantle a state’s military capabilities.
Several factors explain the variation in these two cases. First, Venezuela boasts modest military resources and capabilities compared to Iran. Tehran has developed domestic drone and missile programs, coupled with years of preparation for potential confrontation with Israel and the U.S. These factors provided Iran with a higher level of resilience compared to Venezuela.
Regime structure and ideology are other variables explaining the variance in the outcome. In contrast to Venezuela, the Iranian political system is vastly different, with institutions playing a more prominent role in policymaking.
The Assembly of Experts elects a successor to maintain political continuity. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) protects leadership and holds significant influence across military, political, and economic affairs. The Guardian Council oversees candidates and ensures ideological consistency.
These institutions create a safety net and ensure Iran is not dependent on a single individual, maintaining cohesion even after the Supreme Leader’s death.
Relying purely on decapitation strikes presents significant risks. One major issue is the unpredictable response. Iranian forces continue to strike regional targets, highlighting strategic uncertainty. Another problem is regional escalation; removing leaders can trigger chaos, prolonging conflicts and creating instability.
Finally, decapitation strikes may produce a “rally-around-the-flag” effect, where foreign attacks boost domestic support for the regime rather than weaken it.
Policymakers must avoid treating decapitation strikes as a one-size-fits-all solution. Success depends on the adversary’s institutional resilience, military capability, and strategic context. Removing a leader may bring short-term gains but rarely ensures lasting political stability.
Decapitation strikes are merely one tool in the foreign policy toolbox, not a guarantee of victory.
Iranian civilian and military officials have pledged their obedience to the new lead...
Entry and exit across the state border between Azerbaijan and Iran for all types of cargo vehicles, including thos...
The Group of Seven (G7) finance ministers will meet on Monday to discuss a global rise in oil prices and a joint r...
Bahrain’s state-owned oil company Bapco has declared force majeure after an attack set the country’s only refinery ablaze. The firm say...
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief. Here are the top news stori...
In the Middle East, wars rarely remain confined to battlefields. Their most profound and enduring consequences are often measured not in military victories but in human displacement.
What has unfolded in northern Syria recently is not the dramatic defeat of a community, nor a humanitarian parable of “betrayal”. It reflects a familiar pattern in Middle Eastern geopolitics: the quiet removal of a proxy whose strategic usefulness has expired.
Trump says the United States "don’t need people that join wars after we’ve already won," targeting his criticism at UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Israel continues to fire missles at strategic sites in Iran and Gulf regions report more strikes from Iran.
Baku has completed its evacuation of staff from the Azerbaijan Consulate General in Tabriz, while most employees from the Azerbaijan Embassy in Tehran have also returned.
U.S. President Donald Trump threatened further attacks on Iran on Saturday (7 March), while the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia continued to shoot down missiles in their airspace. Meanwhile, Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran would stop attacking its neighbours.
Russian attacks on Ukraine’s second largest city in the early hours of Saturday (7 March) killed 10 people, including two children. Kharkiv mayor, Ihor Terekov, said 10 residents died after a Russian ballistic missile hit a five storey apartment block in the city.
Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is a hardline cleric with strong backing from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. His rise signals continuity in Tehran's anti-Western policies.
In the Middle East, wars rarely remain confined to battlefields. Their most profound and enduring consequences are often measured not in military victories but in human displacement.
Global market valuation of virtual currencies has surged to an unprecedented $2.73 trillion, approaching half the value of the world’s gold reserves. Yet for many investors, the promise of decentralisation is overshadowed by a growing concern: digital assets may be seized without prior warning.
Some changes are immediately visible: new turbines on the steppe, solar panels on rooftops, and figures in reports. Other changes mature in silence - but transform everything. Azerbaijan, for decades associated with black gold, is now writing a new chapter.
As the 2026 Spring Festival draws to a close, fresh data suggests China’s holiday spending boom reflects more than peak consumption. It points to a deeper structural transition, as consumers shift from buying more goods to buying in different ways.
Against a backdrop of mounting environmental pressure across Central Asia, the Kazakh Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources has announced that the Regional Ecological Summit (RES) 2026 will take place from 22–24 April in Astana.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment