Zelenskyy: More than 8,000 North Korean troops in Russia
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday that more than 8,000 North Korean troops are currently in Russia, with preparations under wa...
Taxpayer-funded television advertisements featuring U.S. President Donald Trump are drawing criticism from Republicans and Democrats while legal experts question whether public money can be used for spots resembling campaign messaging ahead of the midterm elections.
The three nationally broadcast advertisements, which carry the disclaimer “Paid for by the U.S. Government”, have been defended by the White House as public service announcements promoting patriotism.
Critics argue they could breach restrictions on government propaganda or political activity.
One advertisement shows Trump saying “America will never be a communist country” while a chorus repeatedly sings “love me”. Another features images of Mount Rushmore alongside Trump discussing what he calls the “golden age of America”.
A third uses footage and messaging from a 2024 Trump campaign advertisement in which he describes a “final battle” and pledges to dismantle the “deep state”. The government-funded version carries the taxpayer-funded disclaimer.
The advertisements have aired during major television programmes, including NFL games and “Saturday Night Live”.
The White House has described the spots as “public service announcements” intended to remind Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending. It has not publicly identified the government agency paying for the advertisements or disclosed their total cost.
Criticism has come from members of both sides of America's political divide.
Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he liked the message but believed the advertisements should not be paid for with taxpayer money.
Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana similarly said public officials should not use public funds to promote themselves.
Democratic lawmakers have also questioned the advertisements, with Senator Maggie Hassan seeking information about their production costs, funding sources and legal basis.
The criticism comes just weeks before the November midterm elections, when control of Congress will be contested.
Legal experts have questioned whether the advertisements comply with federal restrictions on the use of government funds for publicity and political activity.
Richard Painter, who served as chief White House ethics lawyer under former President George W. Bush, said the advertisements could violate federal statutes governing government-funded communications.
Other legal experts have pointed to the Hatch Act, which restricts political activity by federal employees. The president himself is exempt from the Hatch Act, but questions could arise over the involvement of other government employees or resources.
The Government Accountability Office has previously interpreted federal restrictions on government publicity to cover material that is purely partisan, self-aggrandising or covert, while allowing government agencies to communicate about policies and programmes.
A formal determination of whether the current advertisements violate federal law would depend on the agencies involved, the funding used and how the material was produced and distributed.
The advertisements come as political groups prepare for the midterm elections.
According to AdImpact figures cited in the supplied material, Republican-aligned groups had reserved at least $888 million in advertising for the weeks ahead, compared with at least $666 million for Democratic groups.
The White House has maintained that its advertisements are not political because they do not explicitly tell viewers how to vote.
The controversy still centres on the use of taxpayer funds for advertisements that prominently feature the president and use themes and footage associated with his political messaging.
Iran has called for a diplomatic solution after U.S. President Donald Trump rejected its Hormuz proposal, while Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran was awaiting a definitive U.S. response through mediators.
A Russian guided aerial bomb has struck an apartment building in Kharkiv, injuring 22 people, including children, according to the city’s mayor. The strike follows a day of near-continuous Russian attacks across Ukraine that killed at least five people.
British police have arrested five men on suspicion of offences under the Explosives Act after a major security incident was declared near RAF Fairford, a British air base used by U.S. air forces in Gloucestershire, England.
Here's your AnewZ Daily Brief for 28 September 2026. These are the top stories making headlines in technology.
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan has arrived in Washington for talks with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on bilateral ties and key regional and international developments, Saudi state news agency SPA reported.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday that more than 8,000 North Korean troops are currently in Russia, with preparations under way to send another 10,000.
Health authorities in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are warning that gaps in contact tracing and continued deaths outside treatment centres are contributing to a renewed rise in Ebola transmission, as the country’s latest outbreak passes 8,000 confirmed cases.
Hurricane Polo closed in on Mexico's Baja California Sur on Monday evening, threatening its Pacific coastline with destructive wind, flash floods and a storm surge before crossing the peninsula and making a second landfall on the mainland.
The European Union's decision to simultaneously advance accession talks with Ukraine, Moldova, Montenegro and Albania marks its most ambitious enlargement effort in more than two decades.
SpaceX’s next-generation Starship rocket reached orbit for the first time on Monday despite an unexpected engine shutdown, deploying 26 new Starlink satellites before ending its shortened test flight with a controlled touchdown in the Pacific.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment