Donald Trump's attempt to end automatic citizenship for some children born in the U.S. has suffered a major setback after the Supreme Court declined to embrace the central constitutional argument behind his policy.
While the court recently sided with the Trump administration on the narrower issue of nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts, it stopped short of endorsing the president's attempt to reinterpret birthright citizenship.
The justices did not rule on whether the executive order itself is constitutional, leaving the issue unresolved and likely to be the subject of further litigation.
At the heart of the debate is the 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to confer U.S. citizenship on almost everyone born on American soil, regardless of their parents' immigration status. That interpretation has been reinforced by more than a century of legal precedent.
Trump's executive order sought to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. if their parents were in the country unlawfully or only temporarily. The move represented one of the most ambitious attempts in modern times to reshape U.S. immigration policy through executive action.
The proposal faced immediate legal challenges, with federal courts repeatedly concluding that it was likely to be unconstitutional. Judges across multiple jurisdictions blocked enforcement of the order, describing it as incompatible with the citizenship protections set out in the Constitution.
For Trump and his supporters, the policy formed part of a broader effort to tighten immigration controls and discourage illegal entry into the U.S. Critics argued that it represented a direct challenge to one of the country's most firmly established constitutional principles.
The outcome may push the administration to focus its efforts elsewhere in its immigration agenda. If barriers to entry are strengthened, officials argue, fewer undocumented migrants will be able to reach U.S. territory in the first place.
That strategy aligns with a broader emphasis on border enforcement, deportations, and tighter restrictions on asylum and immigration pathways. Rather than seeking to alter citizenship rules with deep constitutional roots, future policy initiatives may concentrate on preventing irregular migration before it reaches American soil.
The controversy surrounding birthright citizenship has become one of the most consequential legal and political debates in U.S. immigration policy. Supporters of the president's position argue that the 14th Amendment has been interpreted too broadly, while opponents maintain that any effort to narrow its protections would undermine a fundamental constitutional guarantee.
With the Supreme Court yet to issue a definitive ruling on the constitutionality of Trump's order, the issue is likely to remain before the courts and at the centre of political debate for years to come. What is clear, however, is that the justices were not prepared, at least for now, to overturn more than 150 years of legal understanding surrounding who becomes an American citizen at birth.
Indian police detained more than 2,000 protesters in Delhi on Saturday as authorities blocked a planned demonstration calling for the resignation o...
A powerful explosion has been reported at King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, raising fresh concerns over aviation security in Saudi Arabi...
At least 12 people, including three children, have been killed in a Russian attack on the Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia, a day after U.S. Presiden...
Leaders of countries from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) have agreed to hold coordinated population censuses around 2030. They took the decision at the CIS Council of Heads of State meeting in Awaza, Turkmenistan on Friday, media reported.
A powerful explosion has been reported at King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, raising fresh concerns over aviation security in Saudi Arabia as tensions across the region continue to escalate.
Britain and Israel have reached a temporary compromise over the future of the British Consulate General in East Jerusalem, easing a diplomatic dispute that had threatened to further strain relations between the two countries.
South African judge Navanethem “Navi” Pillay won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday “for her efforts to promote peace and international law,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee said.
The U.S. has imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Friday (9 October) escalating tensions with European allies and potentially targeting companies that provide services to the tribunal. The move came hours after former ICC judge Navi Pillay won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Indian police detained more than 2,000 protesters in Delhi on Saturday as authorities blocked a planned demonstration calling for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over disputed changes to voter lists.
At least 12 people, including three children, have been killed in a Russian attack on the Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia, a day after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a deal to ease sanctions on Russian diesel.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has criticised U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to ease sanctions on Russian diesel exports, questioning why Moscow was granted an economic benefit without an apparent concession towards ending the war in Ukraine.
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed surprise after Donald Trump mediated the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace agreement in 2025, the U.S. President said at a rally in New York state on Friday.
The United Nations has condemned a sharp rise in attacks on civilians in Ukraine, reporting that more than 100 people were killed and at least 429 injured in a single week as Russian strikes hit residential areas, passenger buses and critical infrastructure.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment