live Qatar shoots down Iranian jets: All the latest news on the Iran strikes
The Middle East crisis intensifies after the deadly attack on the compound of the Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei on Saturday t...
The U.S. Supreme Court could decide on Friday whether to allow enforcement of Donald Trump’s order limiting birthright citizenship, a move that would end automatic citizenship for many children born on American soil.
The Supreme Court is set to rule on an emergency request by the Trump administration seeking to scale back nationwide injunctions blocking his executive order to restrict birthright citizenship. Federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts had stopped the directive, stating it likely violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment.
On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order instructing federal agencies not to recognise citizenship for children born in the United States unless at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident. This change would deny citizenship to more than 150,000 newborns annually, according to legal challenges led by 22 Democratic state attorneys general and immigrant rights groups.
The administration argues that the 14th Amendment does not grant citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants or to those whose parents are in the country temporarily, such as students and workers on visas. However, plaintiffs cite the amendment’s clear language stating all “persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.”
The Citizenship Clause was ratified in 1868, following the Civil War, to guarantee citizenship to freed slaves and their children. Trump’s legal team contends it was never intended to apply broadly to children of non-citizens.
During arguments on May 15, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer told justices that Trump’s order reflects the amendment’s original meaning, covering former slaves' children rather than those of illegal migrants or visitors.
The administration also asked the Supreme Court to use this case to limit the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, arguing that such orders hamper presidential authority. Universal injunctions have blocked various Trump directives in the past, and while presidents from both parties have opposed them, supporters say they remain an effective check on executive overreach.
An 1898 Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark established that children born on U.S. soil to non-citizen parents are citizens. The Trump administration claims this precedent applies only to parents with permanent U.S. residence.
Recent polling shows limited public support for ending birthright citizenship. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted on June 11-12 found only 24% of Americans support ending it, while 52% oppose. Among Republicans, support was higher at 43%, with 24% opposed. For Democrats, only 5% supported the move.
The Supreme Court currently holds a 6-3 conservative majority. In recent months, it has upheld several of Trump’s immigration policies, including allowing deportations without harm assessments and ending temporary legal status for many migrants. However, it blocked his attempt to deport Venezuelans under an old wartime law, citing due process concerns.
The ruling on birthright citizenship is expected to have significant constitutional implications, potentially reshaping a long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment and impacting thousands of families across the United States.
Follow the latest developments and global reaction after the U.S. and Israel launched “major combat operations” in Iran, prompting retaliation from Tehran.
Saudi Arabia’s state oil giant Saudi Aramco closed its Ras Tanura refinery on Monday following an Iranian drone strike, an industry source told Reuters as Tehran retaliated across the Gulf after a U.S.-Israeli attack on Iranian targets over the weekend.
The Kremlin is utilising the recent United States and Israeli military strikes on Iran to validate its ongoing war in Ukraine. Russian officials are pointing to the escalation in the Middle East as evidence that Western nations do not adhere to international rules.
The Middle East crisis intensifies after the deadly attack on the compound of the Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei on Saturday that killed him, other family members and senior figures. Iran has launched retaliatory strikes on U.S. targets in the region.
Ayatollah Alireza Arafi has moved into a pivotal constitutional role following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, becoming the clerical member of Iran’s temporary leadership council under Article 111 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The U.S.-Iran crisis has entered its third day, with further strikes reported across the Middle East and the death toll rising. Oil prices have surged to levels last seen during the Covid-19 pandemic, raising fears of economic disruption and higher prices worldwide.
The UK said it's allowing the U.S. to use its bases for defensive strikes against Iran amid escalating missile attacks, after a suspected drone strike hit a British airbase in southern Cyprus, causing limited damage.
The Kremlin is utilising the recent United States and Israeli military strikes on Iran to validate its ongoing war in Ukraine. Russian officials are pointing to the escalation in the Middle East as evidence that Western nations do not adhere to international rules.
European Union stands with its member states in the face of any threat, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in response to the drone strike that hit Britain's Royal Air Force base of Akrotiri in southern Cyprus overnight.
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief. Here are the top news stories for the 27th of February, covering the latest developments you need to know.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment