Saudi Arabia intercepts drone over Riyadh amid rising Houthi attacks
Saudi Arabia’s air defences have intercepted and destroyed a hostile drone over the Riyadh region, according to the Saudi-led coalition fight...
A U.S. federal judge has halted a key part of President Donald Trump's effort to tighten rules around mail-in voting, dealing another legal setback to the administration's attempts to expand federal involvement in election oversight ahead of November's congressional elections.
The ruling centres on a provision that would have required states to share lists of voters eligible to receive ballots by mail. Under the plan, the U.S. Postal Service could have refused to deliver ballots in states that failed to comply.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani concluded that the federal government does not have the authority to impose such requirements on states, arguing that election administration is primarily a state responsibility under the U.S. Constitution.
The decision marks the latest chapter in a long-running debate over mail-in voting and the balance of power between federal and state authorities.
Trump has repeatedly argued for stricter election rules and has remained critical of vote-by-mail systems since the 2020 presidential election. The executive order, signed in March, formed part of a broader effort by his administration to increase oversight of election procedures ahead of the 2026 midterms, when control of Congress will be at stake.
Supporters of the order argued it was intended to strengthen election security and ensure that mail ballots are sent only to eligible voters.
Critics, however, viewed the measure as an attempt to create new barriers to voting and warned that it could disrupt established election processes in many states.
The judge's latest ruling broadens an earlier order issued in June that temporarily blocked implementation of the policy in 23 states.
Voting rights organisations had urged the court to go further, arguing that allowing the Postal Service to proceed elsewhere could create confusion and uncertainty as election preparations accelerate.
In her decision, Talwani wrote that changing election procedures so close to a national vote could undermine public confidence and create unnecessary disruption.
The ruling effectively prevents the U.S. Postal Service from implementing the contested portion of the executive order nationwide while the legal challenge continues.
The White House defended the president's election agenda, saying the administration remains committed to pursuing what it describes as measures aimed at protecting the integrity and security of U.S. elections.
The Trump administration has already asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in the case and overturn earlier restrictions imposed by the lower court. Government lawyers have argued that the challenge was brought before any final implementation plan had been completed and that the courts acted prematurely.
The Supreme Court has not yet issued a decision.
The timing of the case has added to its significance.
With fewer than three months remaining before Americans vote in the 2026 midterm elections, election officials across the country are already finalising procedures for ballot distribution and voter registration.
Voting rights advocates welcomed the ruling, arguing that stability and clarity are essential during the final stages of election preparation.
The decision means existing mail voting procedures will remain in place for now while the broader legal battle over the limits of presidential authority in election administration continues through the courts.
As the midterm elections approach, the case is expected to remain one of the most closely watched election-related disputes in the United States, with the potential for a future Supreme Court ruling to shape the role of the federal government in election oversight.
The U.S. has approved the sale of 500 Patriot PAC-3 missiles to Ukraine in a deal worth an estimated $2.1 billion, but Kyiv could face years of delays before receiving the weapons it urgently needs to defend against intensifying Russian attacks.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has ordered Iran's armed forces to respond to any threat immediately and without geographical limits in statements posted to social media platforms on Saturday (31 October).
Demonstrators carrying Iranian flags and placards supporting the hijab gathered outside the Azerbaijani Embassy in London.
A Chinese-made AI chip has matched Nvidia’s H200 in tests conducted by its developer, marking a potential breakthrough in China’s efforts to reduce its dependence on foreign technology.
A hacking group linked to North Korea is widely believed to be behind the theft of $6.3 billion from cryptocurrency giant Binance, a cyberattack that experts describe as the largest cryptocurrency heist on record.
Police were deployed across Paris on Saturday, as a curfew was set to take effect in the Republique and Châtelet-Les Halles areas from 11pm Saturday until 6am Sunday (1 November).
A drone strike hit a power station in northern Sudan early Sunday (1 November), sparking a fire and triggering loud explosions, witnesses said.
Gen Z protests swept 34 German cities on Saturday (31 October) over education and living costs. Violence erupted in Frankfurt, where shops were looted and police reported Molotov cocktail attacks.
Iran designated Britain's Royal Navy and Royal Air Force as terrorist organisations on Sunday, (1 November), and classified the country's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, as a hostile group, according to a statement from the Iranian Foreign Ministry.
Thousands protested in Albania's capital, Tirana, on Saturday (31 October), demanding Prime Minister Edi Rama's resignation over perceived corruption allegations and dissatisfaction with the government over a lack of jobs and poor education standards.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment