Coalition of 25 U.S. states challenges Trump's new tariffs

Coalition of 25 U.S. states challenges Trump's new tariffs
A container ship passes under the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, in San Francisco, California, U.S., 9 April 2026.
Reuters

A coalition of 25 US states has launched a legal challenge against the Trump administration, arguing that its latest attempt to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from around the world exceeds presidential powers and risks pushing up prices for American consumers.

The case, filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, seeks to halt proposed tariffs of between 10% and 12.5%, marking the latest confrontation over President Donald Trump's use of trade measures.

The lawsuit claims the administration relied on a fast-tracked investigation into forced labour abroad to justify introducing the tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act, despite earlier tariff plans being blocked by the courts.

State attorneys general argue the inquiry was completed unusually quickly, covering around 60 economies in just over two months. They say the review failed to distinguish between countries or products where forced labour is more prevalent, calling into question the basis for the proposed measures.

The filing also argues that the White House is attempting to exercise powers reserved for Congress by effectively imposing new taxes on imported goods.

New York Attorney General Letitia James said the administration had overstepped its constitutional authority.

"No matter how the administration tries to justify it, the law and our Constitution are clear that the president does not have the power to impose sweeping tariffs on whatever countries he wants," she said.

Concerns over rising costs

The coalition warns the tariffs would have consequences far beyond international trade, increasing the cost of everyday goods for households and businesses.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul described the measures as "a tax on hardworking families", saying consumers could end up paying more for essentials including groceries and construction materials.

The states are asking the court to strike down the tariffs, arguing the administration acted unlawfully and ignored the procedures required under federal law.

White House stands by tariffs

The White House has dismissed the lawsuit, insisting the administration is acting within the powers granted by Congress.

Spokesperson Kush Desai said the tariffs are intended to tackle unfair trade practices linked to poor labour standards overseas, arguing such practices disadvantage American workers.

He also defended the use of Section 301, saying it has remained an effective and legally robust trade tool since President Trump's first term.

The case adds to a series of legal disputes over President Trump's tariff strategy, which has become a cornerstone of his economic agenda.

Supporters argue the measures protect American industry and encourage fairer trade, while critics say they increase costs for businesses and consumers and stretch the limits of presidential authority.

The outcome of the case could shape how far future administrations can go in using tariffs without explicit approval from Congress.

Read more:

Tags