South Sudan’s endless betrayal of the independence dream

The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ

I remember being in Addis Ababa on February 2, 2015, when South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir and rebel commander Riek Machar exchanged documents after negotiations that had started the previous day and only concluded in the early hours. The hall was quiet and heavy with exhaustion. Delegates sat waiting, while journalists leaned forward to catch a glimpse of the two men whose decisions carried so much weight.

When Kiir and Machar finally stood up, shook hands and signed the agreement, there was cautious applause. They had agreed to form a Transitional Government of National Unity to run for 30 months. On paper, it promised much: to restore peace, help displaced people return, promote reconciliation, reform governance and rebuild the country.

In that moment there was a sense of hope. Many of us knew past peace pacts had collapsed but still believed this one might turn the page. South Sudan was only four years into independence, and there was a feeling that the young nation could still be steered toward unity and stability.

From independence to civil war

That hope was anchored in the memory of July 2011, when South Sudanese filled the streets of Juba to celebrate independence. After decades of conflict and marginalization, the new nation of approximately 12 million people carried enormous potential. Independence was meant to deliver dignity, peace and development, not only for its citizens but also stability for the wider region.

Less than two years later, South Sudan slipped into civil war. The uneasy alliance between Kiir and Machar fell apart once the common enemy in Khartoum was gone. Old suspicions hardened, personal ambitions rose to the surface, and by 2013 fighting had erupted. The conflict deepened ethnic divisions and brought mass killings, famine and displacement.

The transitional government promised in Addis Ababa in 2015 was supposed to end that cycle. Instead, it became another broken agreement. Reforms never took hold, displaced citizens remained uprooted, and the same leaders circled each other in a contest that has kept the nation in limbo.

Machar himself has been in and out of government several times. Most recently, he was appointed as First Vice President in February 2020 under the Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity. That arrangement was also meant to reset the political order, but mistrust persisted.

The betrayal of a dream

The announcement that Vice President Machar will face treason charges underscores just how far the dream of independence has collapsed. On paper, it may appear to be a legal process. In practice it reflects the same rivalry that has consumed South Sudan since its birth.

For ordinary people, independence was never about Kiir or Machar. It was about schools, hospitals, roads and the chance to live without fear of war. More than a decade later, those hopes lie in ruins. Hunger is widespread. Millions remain displaced. Corruption has hollowed out institutions. Children are growing up in camps rather than classrooms.

The sense of betrayal goes further. The international community that once celebrated and invested heavily in South Sudan has lost faith. Donor fatigue is evident, and mediators who have spent years shuttling between Juba and Addis have seen their efforts dissolve into more fighting. South Sudan, once a story of hope, is now cited as a warning of how liberation movements can stumble once power is achieved.

Refugees, oil and regional strain

The collapse has not stayed within South Sudan’s borders. Wars and instability have pushed millions into exile. Uganda hosts more than a million South Sudanese refugees, many of them women and children. Kenya, Ethiopia and Sudan carry their share of the burden too. The strain on schools, hospitals and land is visible across the region. Local communities are generous, but the pressure is undeniable.

At the same time the economy has been gutted. Oil, which was supposed to be the foundation of development, has instead become both a curse and a casualty of conflict. South Sudan holds about 3.75 billion barrels of proven reserves, placing it among the continent’s top oil-rich countries.

Yet this wealth has brought little benefit to citizens. Production has fallen sharply over the years, crippled by fighting around oilfields, corruption and disputes with Sudan over pipeline fees. Revenue that should fund public services rarely reaches citizens.

The fallout spreads to neighbors as well. Sudan relies on pipeline fees and has clashed repeatedly with Juba. Kenya once hoped South Sudan’s oil would boost regional trade but insecurity has blocked those ambitions. Uganda’s trading relationship has been overtaken by the heavy burden of refugees. Oil was meant to tie the region closer together but instead it has fueled mistrust and instability.

A future still held hostage

The treason case against Machar risks dragging South Sudan into yet another dark chapter. If it is used to settle scores rather than strengthen institutions, it will only deepen mistrust. If it closes the door on reconciliation, it will confirm that the pursuit of power has buried the promise of independence.

What South Sudan needs is leadership that builds institutions stronger than any individual. Yet the reality is that the country remains trapped in the duel between two men whose rivalry has already cost countless lives. Younger leaders and reformers are denied space. Citizens who once danced in Juba in 2011, now watch as their hopes vanish in endless cycles of betrayal.

When I think back to that morning in Addis Ababa, the sense of loss is clear. The leaders who promised to restore peace and rebuild the country have instead dragged it deeper into crisis. The charges against Machar are more than a courtroom matter. They symbolize how fragile the independence dream has become, hostage to ambition and mistrust.

Unless South Sudan can rise above the politics of revenge and rivalry, it will remain a cautionary tale. Independence gave the country a flag and an anthem, but without unity and vision, it risks never becoming a nation.

Copied