A South Korean court on Friday cancelled the arrest warrant for impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol, potentially paving the way for his release from jail as he faces trial on insurrection charges related to a brief imposition of martial law.

The Seoul Central District Court ruled that the indictment against President Yoon was filed after the initial detention period had expired and raised “questions about the legality” of the investigation process, which involved two separate agencies. The ruling does not dismiss the criminal charges that led to Yoon’s arrest on January 15, nor does it affect his ongoing impeachment case before the Constitutional Court.

Both legal actions stem from Yoon’s December 3 declaration of martial law, a move that also resulted in the impeachment of the prime minister, who subsequently assumed the role of acting president. South Korea’s Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok, now acting head of state, has been working to stabilize economic markets and reassure international partners amid the current governmental uncertainty.

Yoon’s legal team and his presidential office welcomed the district court’s decision, arguing that it demonstrated the rule of law in South Korea and underscored the politically motivated nature of the charges against him. “The court’s decision to cancel the arrest showed this country’s rule of law is still alive,” his lawyers said, calling for his immediate release. However, they acknowledged that his freedom might be delayed if prosecutors choose to appeal the decision.

The defense has argued that the warrant issued on January 19, which extended Yoon’s detention, was procedurally flawed. They also contend that the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) lacked the legal authority to investigate Yoon on insurrection charges.

Legal experts caution that while the ruling does not vindicate President Yoon, it does raise significant questions about the indictment’s integrity and the legal process surrounding the investigation. These unresolved issues could serve as grounds for a higher court to overturn future trial court decisions.

Separately, the Constitutional Court is expected to deliver its decision on whether to permanently remove or reinstate President Yoon, a verdict that could trigger a new presidential election within 60 days if removal is confirmed.

Yoon defended his brief martial law declaration, stating it was necessary to counter “anti-state” elements, though he lifted the measure six hours later after parliament rejected it. He has maintained that he never intended to impose full emergency military rule.

Copied