Epstein files: what the new documents reveal

Epstein files: what the new documents reveal
Late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Washington, D.C., U.S., 18 December, 2025
Reuters

The release of a new collection of documents by the U.S. Department of Justice has reopened long-running questions about how the Jeffrey Epstein case has been handled, what has been made public, and what remains undisclosed.

While the latest disclosure includes hundreds of thousands of pages from past FBI investigations and records linked to Epstein’s death in custody, it has also drawn criticism from across the political spectrum, with lawmakers questioning the scope of the release and the extent of redactions.

The Epstein files have long been a sensitive issue for President Donald Trump, with many of his supporters and Republicans in Congress demanding their full release. It remains unclear whether this latest disclosure, which officials say is only partial, will satisfy critics.

The Justice Department released the documents on 19 December, saying they include material from FBI investigations in 2006 and 2018, as well as records related to Epstein’s death in custody in 2019. Officials said further documents would be released over the next two weeks.

The Epstein files have long been a sensitive political issue, particularly for President Donald Trump, with many of his supporters and Republicans in Congress calling for their full release. It remains unclear whether the latest disclosure, which officials say is only partial, will satisfy critics.

Limited references to Trump

One of the main questions ahead of the release was how prominently President Trump would feature in the files, given his past social ties to Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s. Trump has said the two fell out in the mid-2000s, before Epstein’s first conviction in 2008.

An initial review by Reuters found few references to Mr Trump. Among them was a photograph appearing to show Epstein holding a cheque bearing Trump’s name, and another image taken inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse showing a copy of Trump’s 1997 book, Trump: The Art of the Comeback, on a bookshelf.

Trump’s name had previously appeared in flight manifests and a contact book linked to Epstein, made public during the 2021 trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former associate who was convicted of child sex trafficking and related offences. Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.

More material involving Bill Clinton

By contrast, the documents contain a number of references to former Democratic president Bill Clinton. Several photographs show Clinton in social settings with Epstein and Maxwell, including images taken near a swimming pool and a hot tub. Another photo shows a painting of Clinton in a blue dress hanging in Epstein’s New York home.

Clinton has denied any knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities and has said he regrets having associated with him. His deputy chief of staff, Angel Urena, described the images as “grainy, 20-plus-year-old photos” and said Clinton was unaware of Epstein’s crimes at the time.

The release of the Clinton-related material has raised questions about Justice Department policy, which typically avoids releasing information tied to ongoing investigations. President Trump has ordered the department to investigate Clinton’s ties to Epstein, a move critics describe as politically motivated.

Victims, massage therapist list and redactions

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the department had identified more than 1,200 victims of Epstein and their relatives during what he called an exhaustive review of the files. One document included a list of 254 masseuses associated with Epstein, although all names were redacted.

Many of the documents released were heavily censored. One 119-page file believed to contain grand jury testimony was completely blacked out, along with several other lengthy documents.

The redactions prompted criticism from lawmakers across party lines. Democratic Senator Adam Schiff called on Attorney General Pam Bondi to explain why the full set of files had not been released by the legal deadline set by Congress. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the disclosure represented only “a fraction of the whole body of evidence”.

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, a sponsor of the law mandating the release, said the partial disclosure failed to meet both the “spirit and the letter” of the legislation.

With further releases expected, the U.S. Department of Justice- and President Trump- are likely to face continued scrutiny over whether the Epstein files have been fully and transparently disclosed.

Tags