Kazakhstan grain harvest hit by drought as Black Sea risks threaten markets
Kazakhstan's grain sector faces a difficult season as drought reduces harvest prospects while mounting security risks in the Black Sea threaten to red...
Pakistan has warned that any attempt by India to block or significantly reduce river flows under the Indus Waters Treaty could have “far-reaching consequences”, after India's water minister said New Delhi was working to ensure that “not a single drop” of water reaches Pakistan in the coming years.
The warning marks the latest escalation in tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours, whose relations have remained strained since a brief but intense military confrontation in May 2025 and the subsequent suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty.
Speaking at a weekly media briefing, Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said any deliberate attempt to deprive Pakistan of water essential for its survival, agriculture and economic development would be viewed with the utmost seriousness.
“Pakistan firmly rejects any notion that water can be used as a political weapon or instrument of coercion,” Andrabi said, warning that such a move could threaten regional peace and security.
The latest dispute follows remarks by Indian Water Resources Minister C.R. Patil, who said New Delhi was actively implementing plans to prevent water from flowing into Pakistan after India placed the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance. Patil said the effort was being carried out under directives from Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
India suspended participation in the treaty following the April 2025 attack in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on Pakistan. Islamabad denied involvement and rejected the allegations. Since then, the treaty has remained suspended despite a ceasefire that halted military hostilities.
Brokered by the World Bank and signed in 1960, the Indus Waters Treaty governs the sharing of water from six rivers in the Indus basin between India and Pakistan.
The agreement allocates the three western rivers — the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab — primarily to Pakistan, while granting India rights over the eastern rivers. For more than six decades, the treaty survived wars, diplomatic crises and military standoffs, making it one of the world's most enduring water-sharing agreements.
The river system is critical to Pakistan's economy. More than 90 per cent of the country's food production depends on irrigation from the Indus basin, while millions rely on the rivers for drinking water and hydropower generation.
The latest dispute comes after the two countries engaged in their worst military confrontation in years in May 2025. The fighting involved missiles, drones, and air strikes before a ceasefire was reached. However, key punitive measures adopted by both sides, including India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, remained in place.
Analysts say water security is increasingly becoming a strategic dimension of the broader India-Pakistan rivalry, alongside longstanding disputes over Kashmir and cross-border militancy.
Experts warn that any sustained reduction in water availability could have serious consequences for Pakistan's agriculture, food security and energy sector.
Pakistan is among the world's most water-stressed countries, and the Indus basin supports the majority of its agricultural production. Reduced river flows could affect crop yields, rural livelihoods and hydropower generation, increasing economic pressures at a time when the country is already facing climate-related challenges.
Islamabad has repeatedly maintained that unilateral efforts to alter treaty obligations violate international law and threaten regional stability. Pakistani officials say the country is prepared to pursue diplomatic and legal avenues to safeguard its water rights.
With tensions once again rising, the future of the Indus Waters Treaty has become increasingly uncertain, raising concerns that water could emerge as the next major flashpoint in South Asia.
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief. Here are the top news stories for the 23rd of July, covering the latest developments you need to know.
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief. Here are the top news stories for the 24th July, covering the latest developments you need to know.
U.S. strikes on Iran entered a 12th consecutive night, while Yemen's Houthis said they attacked two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, urging President Donald Trump to warn Tehran it would be held responsible for any future Houthi attacks.
The U.S. military said it completed a fresh wave of strikes on Iran late on Thursday, marking the 13th consecutive night of American attacks. The latest operation lasted more than two hours, according to U.S. Central Command.
Aleksandar Vučić's visit to Kyiv on 15 July appeared to send a geopolitical signal. But the significance of the trip lies less in the journey itself than in the limits Serbia carefully observed.
A new state agency wants the world to take Georgian food as seriously as Georgians already do.
Kazakhstan's grain sector faces a difficult season as drought reduces harvest prospects while mounting security risks in the Black Sea threaten to redirect cheaper Russian grain into Central Asian markets.
Uzbekistan welcomed 6.56 million foreign tourists in the first six months of 2026, a 24.9% increase compared with the same period last year, according to the National Statistics Committee. The figures underline the country's growing appeal as one of Central Asia's leading travel destinations.
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis has condemned discussion of Bill H.R. 9087 by the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, rejecting what it described as unfounded accusations against Baku and warning the measure could undermine efforts to advance the Azerbaijan-Armenia peace process.
Pakistan on Thursday warned Yemen's Houthi movement that any attack on Pakistani-flagged vessels or the country's maritime interests would cross a "red line" and trigger a response under its right to self-defence.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment