EU regrets US decision to double steel import tariffs
The European Commission voiced strong regret over the United States’ decision to raise tariffs on imported steel to 50%, warning the move adds uncertainty to the global economy.
The fifth-generation wireless technology, commonly known as 5G, was positioned as a revolutionary advancement that would transform industries, enable smart cities, and deliver unprecedented connectivity experiences
However, six years into its global deployment, 5G has emerged as one of the most expensive technology disappointments of the decade, characterized by massive investment costs, underwhelming performance, and limited consumer benefits 13. This comprehensive analysis examines the multifaceted reasons why 5G has become an expensive flop, from astronomical deployment costs to fundamental technical limitations that have undermined its commercial viability.
Massive Financial Investment with Minimal Returns
Unprecedented Spectrum Costs
The financial foundation of 5G's failure begins with the extraordinary costs telecommunications companies paid for spectrum access 14. Carriers worldwide paid governments more than $150 billion from 2018 through 2024 to access the radio frequencies needed for 5G networks, representing an unprecedented investment in telecommunications infrastructure 1. The United States led this spending spree, with carriers paying over $80 billion for spectrum licenses, followed by China's $58 billion investment.
These spectrum costs alone exceeded the total infrastructure investments made during previous generation rollouts 425. The high prices were driven by government policies that prioritized short-term revenue generation over long-term digital economy development, creating artificial scarcity that inflated auction prices 26. In many cases, operators found themselves paying premium prices for spectrum that would require additional billions in infrastructure investment to make operational 47.
Infrastructure Investment Burden
Beyond spectrum costs, the infrastructure requirements for 5G have proven far more expensive than initially projected 48. McKinsey analysis predicted that network-related capital expenditures would need to increase by 60 percent from 2020 through 2025, roughly doubling the total cost of ownership during that period 8. The deployment of 5G networks has required hundreds of billions of dollars in additional investment for equipment, towers, and network densification 24.
The complexity of 5G infrastructure has compounded these costs significantly 68. Unlike previous generations that could leverage existing tower infrastructure, 5G's reliance on higher frequency bands necessitated the deployment of many more base stations positioned closer together 210. This network densification requirement has made 5G deployment exponentially more expensive than 4G, with some estimates suggesting total global 5G infrastructure costs will exceed $500 billion by 2030 58.
Poor Return on Investment
Despite these massive investments, telecommunications operators have struggled to generate meaningful revenue increases from 5G services 171821. Most carriers have been unable to charge premium prices for 5G access, with consumers showing little willingness to pay extra for services that often perform similarly to existing 4G networks 1021. Industry surveys reveal that 67% of telecommunications executives view 5G as either having "limited success so far" or being "disappointing," with only 33% considering it successful 1721.
The inability to monetize 5G investments has created a significant financial burden for operators 171921. Revenue per user has remained flat or even declined in many markets, while operational costs have increased substantially due to the energy-intensive nature of 5G networks 1819. This disconnect between investment and returns has led many industry observers to question the fundamental business case for 5G deployment 2124.
Technical Performance Failures
Gap Between Promises and Reality
The International Telecommunication Union established ambitious performance targets for 5G networks, including peak download speeds of 20 Gbps, latency of 1 millisecond, and 100-fold improvements in energy efficiency 21. However, real-world 5G deployments have fallen dramatically short of these objectives 1121. Current 5G networks typically deliver peak speeds closer to 1 Gbps rather than the promised 20 Gbps, while latency often remains comparable to 4G at around 30 milliseconds 111221.
A comprehensive analysis by Rochman et al. found that 5G networks show no improvement in spectral efficiency compared to 4G in practical deployments 21. This finding undermines one of the core technical justifications for 5G investment, as spectral efficiency improvements were expected to be a primary driver of network performance gains 21. The failure to achieve meaningful performance improvements has left many users unable to distinguish between 4G and 5G connectivity in everyday usage 210.
Millimeter Wave Implementation Challenges
The high-frequency millimeter wave (mmWave) spectrum, which was promoted as a key differentiator for 5G, has proven particularly problematic in real-world deployments 230. These frequencies suffer from significant atmospheric attenuation, absorption by humidity, and dramatic range reduction due to physical obstacles like buildings and trees 30. Rain and weather conditions can severely impact mmWave performance, making it unreliable for consistent service delivery 30.
The limited range of mmWave frequencies has necessitated extremely dense base station deployments, significantly increasing infrastructure costs while providing coverage only in specific high-density urban areas 230. This has resulted in a fragmented network experience where users frequently fall back to lower-frequency bands that offer performance similar to 4G networks 1011. The practical limitations of mmWave technology have made many of the revolutionary applications promised for 5G unfeasible in real-world conditions 230.
Non-Standalone Network Limitations
Most early 5G deployments utilized non-standalone (NSA) architecture, which builds 5G capabilities on top of existing 4G infrastructure 1124. While this approach reduced initial deployment costs, it significantly limited the performance benefits that 5G could deliver 11. NSA 5G networks are constrained by the capabilities of the underlying 4G core infrastructure, preventing them from achieving the low latency and advanced features that distinguish 5G from previous generations 1124.
The transition to standalone (SA) 5G networks, which would unlock the technology's full potential, has been delayed in many markets due to cost and complexity concerns 1124. This has left consumers and businesses with 5G networks that often perform only marginally better than existing 4G services, undermining the value proposition for the substantial investment required 1121.
Energy Consumption and Environmental Concerns
Dramatic Increase in Power Requirements
One of the most significant drawbacks of 5G deployment has been its massive increase in energy consumption 333738. 5G base stations typically consume 3-6 times more power than their 4G predecessors, with massive MIMO configurations requiring over 3,200 watts compared to 800 watts for a standard 4G base station 3337. This dramatic increase in power consumption occurs despite 5G being more energy-efficient on a per-bit basis 3337.
The proliferation of 5G infrastructure has created unprecedented energy demands for telecommunications networks 3338. In China, where 5G deployment has been most aggressive, total power consumption by telecom networks is expected to double from 50 billion kWh to 100 billion kWh once 5G networks are fully deployed 33. Industry projections suggest that ICT infrastructure, driven largely by 5G deployment, could consume up to 20% of global electricity by 2030 3738.
Environmental Impact and Sustainability Concerns
The increased energy consumption of 5G networks has raised significant environmental concerns, particularly regarding carbon emissions and sustainability 363839. A 2023 study of 5G networks in China revealed additional carbon emissions of 23.82 million tons annually due to the spatial and temporal misalignment between cellular traffic and energy consumption 38. This "carbon efficiency trap" demonstrates that current 5G deployments are contributing to increased emissions rather than supporting environmental sustainability goals 3839.
The manufacturing and deployment of 5G infrastructure has also generated substantial electronic waste as older equipment becomes obsolete 36. The rapid technology cycle and the need for dense base station deployments have accelerated equipment replacement cycles, contributing to growing e-waste problems 36. Additionally, the construction of new cell towers and infrastructure has disrupted natural habitats and ecosystems in many deployment areas 36.
Consumer Adoption and Market Reality
Limited Consumer Benefits
Despite extensive marketing campaigns promoting 5G as a transformative technology, most consumers have experienced minimal tangible benefits from 5G networks 21013. The higher data speeds promised by 5G do not materially improve the user experience for typical smartphone applications like web browsing, social media, and video streaming 221. Most users report being unable to distinguish between 4G and 5G performance in daily usage scenarios 1021.
The coverage limitations of 5G networks have further diminished consumer satisfaction 1022. 5G footprints are typically smaller than 4G coverage areas, leading to frequent network switching and inconsistent performance 1021. Some users have reported worse overall connectivity experiences with 5G enabled, leading them to disable the feature on their devices 21. This poor user experience has undermined consumer enthusiasm for 5G and limited willingness to pay premium prices for 5G services 1321.
Market Adoption Challenges
The adoption of 5G has been significantly slower than industry projections, with many consumers showing little interest in upgrading to 5G-capable devices or services 1316. While 5G smartphone sales have increased, much of this growth has been driven by manufacturers making 5G standard in new devices rather than consumer demand for 5G capabilities 1321. Most consumers who have 5G service never actively chose to add it, instead receiving it automatically when upgrading their devices 21.
Business markets have shown similarly limited enthusiasm for 5G services 618. Private 5G networks face significant barriers including high costs, complexity of deployment, and limited availability of experienced implementation partners 6. Enterprise customers have struggled to identify compelling use cases that justify the substantial investment required for 5G infrastructure 624. The lack of clear return on investment for business applications has slowed enterprise adoption and limited revenue opportunities for telecommunications providers 618.
Regulatory and Technical Challenges
Spectrum Management Issues
The deployment of 5G networks has been complicated by ongoing regulatory challenges and spectrum management issues 2229. Interference between 5G networks and existing wireless services has created significant operational problems, with telecommunications companies facing legal disputes over spectrum conflicts 22. The coexistence of 5G networks with unlicensed Wi-Fi services in the 6 GHz band has resulted in unpredictable interference patterns that degrade network performance 22.
Regulatory delays in spectrum allocation have further hampered 5G deployment efforts 2229. Complex licensing procedures, environmental impact assessments, and zoning regulations have slowed infrastructure deployment and increased costs 2932. These regulatory hurdles have been particularly problematic in dense urban areas where 5G networks require extensive small cell deployments 2232.
Technical Standards and Interoperability
The complexity of 5G technical standards has created significant implementation challenges for network operators 1429. The transition from previous generations has required extensive network infrastructure updates and the development of new operational expertise 614. Many operators have struggled with the technical complexity of 5G network management, particularly in optimizing performance across different frequency bands and deployment scenarios 914.
Interoperability issues between equipment from different vendors have further complicated 5G deployments 1432. The lack of standardized implementation approaches has led to inconsistent network performance and increased integration costs 14. These technical challenges have contributed to delayed deployments and reduced network reliability, undermining the value proposition for 5G investments 914.
Industry Impact and Future Outlook
Equipment Manufacturer Perspective
While telecommunications operators have struggled with 5G return on investment, equipment manufacturers have benefited substantially from the technology transition 1921. Companies like Ericsson and Nokia have sold billions of dollars worth of 5G infrastructure equipment, even as their customers struggle to monetize these investments 19. However, even equipment manufacturers are beginning to feel the impact of slower-than-expected 5G adoption, with companies like Ericsson reporting declining sales and reducing workforce due to decreased 5G spending 19.
The sustainability of the current 5G business model is increasingly questioned as operators become more cautious about additional infrastructure investments 1719. Reduced capital expenditure budgets and delayed deployment timelines are beginning to impact equipment manufacturers' revenues 19. This feedback loop between operator financial performance and vendor sales is creating additional pressure on the entire 5G ecosystem 1719.
Market Consolidation and Strategy Shifts
The financial pressures created by 5G investments are driving increased consolidation in the telecommunications industry 817. Network sharing arrangements and joint infrastructure investments are becoming more common as operators seek to reduce deployment costs 8. Some companies are focusing on specific use cases like Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) as a way to generate revenue from 5G investments 17.
The limited success of consumer 5G markets has led many operators to pivot toward enterprise and industrial applications 1824. However, these markets have proven slower to develop than anticipated, with businesses requiring more time to identify and implement 5G use cases 624. The shift in focus from consumer to enterprise markets represents a significant departure from original 5G business models and revenue projections 1824.
Conclusion
The characterization of 5G as an expensive flop reflects the significant disconnect between the technology's ambitious promises and its real-world performance and adoption 1321. With over $150 billion spent on spectrum licenses alone and hundreds of billions more invested in infrastructure, 5G represents one of the largest technology investments in history 15. However, this massive financial commitment has failed to deliver corresponding benefits for operators, consumers, or the broader economy 1721.
The technical limitations of 5G, including coverage constraints, energy consumption increases, and performance gaps compared to expectations, have undermined its value proposition 102133. Combined with regulatory challenges, slow consumer adoption, and the failure to develop compelling use cases, these factors have created a perfect storm that has prevented 5G from achieving its transformative potential 62122.
While 5G technology may eventually find its niche in specific applications and continue to evolve through future releases, the current deployment represents a cautionary tale about technology hype, unrealistic expectations, and the risks of massive infrastructure investments without clear market demand 2124. The lessons learned from 5G's expensive failure should inform future technology deployments, particularly the much-discussed 6G networks that are already being planned for the next decade 1721.
AnewZ takes to the streets of Yerevan and Baku to ask a simple yet deeply complex question: How do you see peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan? In the first part of our special report, we hear the hopes, doubts, and scars still shaping people’s perspectives on both sides.
On May 28, the inauguration ceremony of Lachin International Airport was held.
A car drove into crowds of Liverpool fans celebrating the club’s Premier League title in the city centre on Monday evening, injuring dozens including 4 children. A 53-year-old man believed to be the driver was arrested at the scene.
EU ministers have greenlit a massive €150 billion defense investment fund—dubbed the Security Action for Europe (SAFE)—as the bloc ramps up its military readiness in response to Russia’s aggression and growing uncertainty over U.S. security guarantees.
Brazil’s economy is expected to have regained momentum in the first quarter of 2025, driven by a surge in household spending and private investment, according to a Reuters poll of economists conducted from May 21–26.
Magnus Carlsen suffered a shock defeat to China’s Wei Yi at Norway Chess 2025, just two days after beating world champion D Gukesh.
The European Commission voiced strong regret over the United States’ decision to raise tariffs on imported steel to 50%, warning the move adds uncertainty to the global economy.
Panic erupted on a Seoul subway train after a man allegedly set a fire onboard, prompting the evacuation of over 400 passengers through a tunnel and sending 21 people to hospital with minor injuries.
Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles has urged China to be more transparent about its military build-up and operations, calling for better communication amid rising concerns over Beijing’s presence in the Pacific.
At least two people, including a 9-year-old girl, were killed in Russian drone and missile attacks on Ukraine, as questions remain over Kyiv’s participation in upcoming peace talks proposed by Moscow.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment