Britain, Canada, Australia and Portugal all officially recognised a Palestinian state on Sunday (21 September), with other countries expected to follow suit this week at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
With growing international recognition, the move raises the question: What would this mean for Palestinians and Israel?
Current Status of Palestinian Statehood
1988 Declaration: The Palestine Liberation Organization declared an independent Palestinian state in 1988, and more than 150 of the 193 U.N. member states have since recognized it.
U.S. Position: The United States has supported the idea of a Palestinian state, but only in the context of a two-state solution negotiated with Israel. This has been the long-standing position of many Western nations, including the major European powers.
Netanyahu's Stance: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that there will never be a Palestinian state, especially given the absence of meaningful negotiations since 2014.
U.N. Observer Status: The Palestinian Authority (PA) has observer status at the United Nations but lacks voting rights. Full U.N. membership would require approval from the Security Council, where the U.S. holds a veto.
Meanwhile, the PA exercises limited self-rule in parts of the West Bank, but Gaza has been controlled by Hamas since 2007. The division between Hamas and the PA complicates the Palestinian effort to present a unified front in international negotiations and diplomacy.
The Aim of Recognising a Palestinian State
Pressure on Israel: Countries such as Britain believe that recognising Palestinian statehood is a way to put pressure on Israel. The aim is to end the war in Gaza, halt the expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank, and push Israel to recommit to the peace process with the Palestinians.
Recognition is seen as a response to Israel's actions in Gaza, particularly the military actions and the humanitarian crisis. Western governments, many of which have been criticised for their lack of action on Israel's policies, see recognition as a form of diplomatic accountability.
What Recognition Has Meant in Practice
Limited Influence: Critics argue that recognising Palestinian statehood has had little practical effect. Countries such as China, India, Russia, and many Arab nations recognised Palestinian independence decades ago, but this has not significantly shifted the dynamics of the conflict.
Despite widespread recognition, the Palestinian Authority lacks the means to conduct full diplomatic relations due to its limited control over borders, its observer status at the U.N., and the restrictions Israel places on access to Gaza and the West Bank. The lack of control over resources, borders, and airspace continues to be a significant hurdle.
Palestinian Authority's Limitations: Without full U.N. membership or control over its borders, the Palestinian Authority has limited ability to conduct international relations. Israel controls access to goods, investment, education, and cultural exchanges. There are no Palestinian airports, and the West Bank is landlocked, with access only through Israel or Jordan's border, while Israel controls access to Gaza.
Potential Impact of Recognition
Diplomatic Opportunities: Despite these limitations, those advocating for recognition, including Palestinian Authority officials, believe it could lead to more meaningful diplomatic partnerships on an equal footing.
Husam Zomlot, head of the Palestinian mission to the UK, argues that recognition could foster stronger partnerships and international cooperation.
Vincent Fean, a former British diplomat, adds that recognition might prompt countries to reconsider their relationship with Israel, including potential actions like boycotting products from Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.
Recognition could also lead to more cooperation on international forums. Countries that recognise Palestine may strengthen their diplomatic ties with the PA, pushing for international support for Palestinian rights.
However, the absence of a clear and unified leadership between the PA and Hamas remains a challenge.
Israel and U.S. Reactions
Israeli Response: Israel, particularly under Netanyahu’s leadership, opposes the recognition, seeing it as a reward to Hamas for its 2023 attacks. Netanyahu has stated unequivocally, "A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River."
Neyanyahu's stance aligns with Israel's broader policy of expanding settlements in the West Bank, which many see as undermining the feasibility of a two-state solution.
U.S. Opposition: The United States, Israel's closest ally, also opposes the recognition. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on Palestinian officials, including blocking President Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinian Authority figures from attending the U.N. General Assembly by revoking their visas.
The U.S. response is part of its broader policy of supporting Israel politically and militarily. U.S. President Donald Trump, in particular, made significant moves to align U.S. policy closely with Israeli interests, including moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
In conclusion: What does recognition really mean?
International recognition of a Palestinian state could pressure Israel to change its policies, but without full control over its borders, resources, or full U.N. membership, the Palestinian Authority's ability to translate recognition into tangible change is limited.
While symbolic, recognition may still pave the way for future diplomatic shifts, forcing countries to reconsider their relationships with Israel and pushing for greater accountability in the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Key Takeaways
Palestinian statehood recognition is growing but faces practical limitations.
The U.S. and Israel’s opposition remains a significant barrier to full U.N. membership and broader international change.
Recognition could lead to diplomatic shifts, but substantial structural changes depend on broader shifts in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The head of the United Arab Emirates‑backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) of Yemen, Aidarous al-Zubaidi, has fled to an unknown location on We...
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief: here are the top news stories for the 7th of January, covering the latest developments you need to k...
European countries and the United States presented a united front in support of Ukraine, unveiling security guarantees backed by Washington and a deta...
Iran has executed a man accused of spying for Israel’s Mossad intelligence service, the country’s judiciary reported on Wednesday, 7 January, amid...
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said on Wednesday (7 January), that significant progress has been made in restoring trust with China. He also rei...
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief: here are the top news stories for the 7th of January, covering the latest developments you need to know.
European countries and the United States presented a united front in support of Ukraine, unveiling security guarantees backed by Washington and a detailed plan for long-term assistance contingent on a ceasefire with Russia.
Iran has executed a man accused of spying for Israel’s Mossad intelligence service, the country’s judiciary reported on Wednesday, 7 January, amid an intensifying campaign against alleged foreign agents.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said on Wednesday (7 January), that significant progress has been made in restoring trust with China. He also reiterated that relations with Japan are equally important for Seoul’s diplomacy amid shifting regional dynamics.
Germany’s foreign intelligence service secretly monitored the telephone communications of former U.S. President Barack Obama for several years, including calls made aboard Air Force One, according to an investigation by the German newspaper Die Zeit.
Israeli media report that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chaired a lengthy security meeting that reportedly focused on the country’s regional threats, including Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran.
At the end of last year, U.S. President Donald Trump was reported to have raised the Azerbaijan–Armenia peace agenda during a conversation with Israel’s prime minister, warning that if peace were not achieved, Washington could raise tariffs on both countries by 100 percent.
President Ilham Aliyev said 2025 has politically closed the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, as a Trump-era reset in U.S. ties, new transport corridors and a push into AI, renewables and defence production reshape Azerbaijan’s priorities.
Protests continued into another day in Iran, with crowds returning to the streets despite mounting pressure from the authorities. By scale and spread, the unrest has entered its most significant phase so far.
Start your day informed with AnewZ Morning Brief: here are the top news stories for the 7th of January, covering the latest developments you need to know.
European countries and the United States presented a united front in support of Ukraine, unveiling security guarantees backed by Washington and a detailed plan for long-term assistance contingent on a ceasefire with Russia.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said on Wednesday (7 January), that significant progress has been made in restoring trust with China. He also reiterated that relations with Japan are equally important for Seoul’s diplomacy amid shifting regional dynamics.
A magnitude 6.7 earthquake has struck off the southern Philippines, with no immediate reports of damage or injuries, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has said.
U.S. President Donald Trump and his team say they're actively exploring options to acquire Greenland, with discussions including the potential use of U.S. military, which is "always an option," according to a statement from the White House on Tuesday.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment