At least 11 killed in Algeria orphanage fire
At least 11 people have been killed and 19 injured in a fire at an orphanage on the outskirts of the Algerian capital, state media reported. The blaze...
Alibaba, one of the world's largest technology and e-commerce companies, has sued the U.S. Pentagon after being added to a blacklist of firms it claims support China's military, escalating a dispute with potentially significant consequences for the company.
Alibaba is one of the largest technology and e-commerce companies on the planet — a business that handles more transactions on its platforms in a single day than many countries process in a month.
Its cloud computing arm serves businesses across Asia and beyond. Its payment platform, Alipay, is used by more than a billion people. For millions of American businesses, Alibaba is a primary gateway to Chinese consumers and suppliers.
So when the U.S. Pentagon added Alibaba to a blacklist of companies it claims support China's military, Alibaba did what very few Chinese companies have done: it hired American lawyers and took the U.S. government to court.
Alibaba filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in federal court in San Jose, California, seeking to be removed from the Pentagon's blacklist of companies it alleges aid China's People's Liberation Army (PLA).
The company said the Pentagon added it to the list without providing substantial evidence or explanation and that the decision violates its constitutional rights to due process and free speech.
The list at the centre of the dispute is known as the Section 1260H list, a congressionally mandated register maintained by the Pentagon of companies it believes are connected to or support the Chinese military.
Being placed on the list does not automatically trigger sanctions or investment restrictions, but it sends a clear signal to U.S. investors, partners and customers to proceed with caution.
For a company such as Alibaba, which has significant ambitions in global markets and relies heavily on the confidence of international investors and business partners, that signal can be damaging in ways that extend far beyond any individual contract or deal.
The Pentagon added Alibaba to the list around two weeks ago, accusing the company of contributing to China's military-civil fusion strategy through an affiliation with China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and of being indirectly affiliated with China's state asset regulator, SASAC.
Alibaba's response was clear and unequivocal: it is not a Chinese military company, it has no role in military-civil fusion, and it intends to challenge the designation in court.
Alibaba said it had been engaging with the Pentagon for months before filing the lawsuit — at least since February, when the Defence Department briefly published a version of the blacklist before withdrawing it minutes later without explanation.
The company said it presented detailed evidence that it does not support the PLA, answered questions and submitted a written response. The Pentagon never replied, and that silence, according to Alibaba, ultimately made legal action necessary.
Alibaba is not alone in fighting back. WuXi AppTec, a Chinese biotechnology company, filed a similar lawsuit on 11 June after also being added to the list. Both cases follow a pattern established by other Chinese companies that have challenged their placement on Pentagon blacklists in U.S. courts, with mixed results.
The legal process is lengthy and costly, and there is no guarantee of success. But for companies of Alibaba's size and profile, doing nothing is not a realistic option.
The 8 June update to the blacklist was sweeping. It expanded the list to 188 entities and included some of China's most prominent companies, including internet giant Baidu, electric vehicle manufacturer BYD, electric vehicle brand Nio, and chipmakers ChangXin Memory Technologies and Yangtze Memory Technologies.
The breadth of the additions raised eyebrows even among critics of China's military ambitions. Alibaba sells groceries and streaming video. BYD manufactures electric vehicles. Baidu operates a search engine.
The argument that these companies meaningfully contribute to China's military capabilities in the same way as a state-owned defence contractor requires a significant leap, and that gap in logic is precisely what Alibaba's legal team is expected to target.
Legal analysts have noted that the two-sentence public rationale provided for Alibaba's designation lacks the evidentiary link courts have previously required — specifically, proof of actual military utility arising from the company's products or technology. Without that, the designation may be legally vulnerable.
Under recent U.S. law, the Pentagon cannot contract with companies on the blacklist from this month onwards and will be prohibited from purchasing their products or services through third parties from 2027.
For most companies on the list, those contracting restrictions have limited practical impact. The greater damage is reputational and financial, as institutional investors become nervous, business partners grow more cautious, and share prices come under pressure whenever fresh headlines emerge.
That is what Alibaba is ultimately trying to prevent. The lawsuit is a company defending its reputation and telling the world that, whatever the Pentagon may claim, it is a technology and commerce business rather than an arm of the Chinese military.
Whether a U.S. federal court agrees is a question that could take years to answer. But Alibaba has clearly decided that the cost of fighting is lower than the cost of remaining on the list.
U.S. President Donald Trump announced the reimposition of a U.S. naval blockade on all Iranian ports and warned that power plants and bridges could be targeted next week unless Tehran returns to negotiations.
The United States carried out a third consecutive night of airstrikes against Iran, targeting military capabilities around the Strait of Hormuz as Donald Trump announced the reinstatement of a blockade on Iranian shipping and proposed a 20% fee on cargo passing through the strategic waterway.
The death toll from the fire at a live music pub in Bangkok has climbed to 32 after two more victims died from their injuries, according to Thailand's Police Hospital.
Ukraine and Russia exchanged fresh attacks on Tuesday, with Kyiv targeting shipping and energy infrastructure inside Russia while Moscow launched another large-scale missile and drone assault on Ukrainian cities.
The U.S. military announced that it has completed a new wave of strikes against Iranian military targets under U.S. President Donald Trump's orders. The operation targeted command centres, air defence systems, missile and drone facilities, and coastal surveillance sites across multiple locations.
At least 11 people have been killed and 19 injured in a fire at an orphanage on the outskirts of the Algerian capital, state media reported. The blaze broke out early on Thursday at the institution in the eastern suburbs of Algiers.
A woman whose husband was sucked out of the window of a plane during a Ryanair flight has recounted pulling her husband to safety. Serbian couple Svetlana Maksimovic and Ljubisa Karovic had just settled into a flight with the airline last week, when a loud bang pierced the hum of engines.
Russia launched a fresh wave of missile strikes on Ukraine early on Thursday, saying it had hit military and industrial facilities in Kyiv, as well as key port infrastructure in the southern Odesa region.
Uganda is expected to discharge its final Ebola patient on Thursday, beginning the 42-day countdown required before the country can be declared free of the virus if no new cases emerge, according to a government spokesperson.
The U.S. Coast Guard has called off its search for three people missing after a pontoon boat capsized near Alcatraz, leaving four people dead or presumed dead.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment