The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
The Democratic Republic of Congo is facing another Ebola outbreak nearly five decades after the virus was first identified near the Ebola River in 1976.
The question raised by this latest emergency is the same one that has lingered after every previous outbreak: why, after decades of experience responding to Ebola, does the world still seem caught off guard each time it returns?
The current outbreak, caused by the Bundibugyo virus, has killed more than 100 people and infected more than 500 people in confirmed cases in the DRC, with additional suspected cases still under investigation. The outbreak has also been confirmed in Uganda, increasing concern about cross-border movement. Ituri Province, a vast region in north-eastern Congo bordering Uganda and home to millions of people, accounts for most of the cases.
The World Health Organization has said that contact tracing has improved but still remains below target. Health workers are operating in a region affected by insecurity, displacement and deep community mistrust. Attacks on response teams and treatment centres have complicated efforts to trace contacts and isolate cases. Some patients have also left treatment facilities, making containment more difficult.
Congo has brought Ebola outbreaks under control before, often under circumstances that would have overwhelmed many health systems. But experience alone does not amount to preparedness. That distinction remains at the heart of the problem.
The world saw the consequences of that gap between experience and preparedness during the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa. What began in a remote part of Guinea became the deadliest Ebola outbreak on record, killing more than 11,000 people across Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.
The virus spread rapidly through countries with fragile health systems, limited surveillance capacity and few treatment facilities. International assistance eventually arrived, but only after local systems had already been overwhelmed. Given the security challenges and weak health infrastructure in parts of eastern Congo, the concern that the latest outbreak could become harder to contain is difficult to dismiss.
What made the West African epidemic so devastating was how quickly it moved through already fragile systems. Surveillance was weak, treatment capacity was limited, and early-warning mechanisms were slow to detect what was happening on the ground. By the time the scale of the crisis was fully understood, containment had become far more difficult and the response far more expensive.
The lesson was clear. Surveillance systems, laboratories and frontline healthcare are cheaper to build before an outbreak than during one. That reality is well understood. But it rarely survives contact with budget decisions in quieter years.
The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and the WHO have announced a joint Ebola response plan seeking roughly 518 million dollars to strengthen outbreak response through November 2026. The plan is intended to support surveillance, laboratory testing, clinical care, coordination and community engagement across affected and at-risk countries.
That scale of need says something important. Ebola preparedness is still being treated too often as an emergency expense rather than as permanent public health infrastructure. Money arrives when the virus is already spreading. Attention rises when the numbers become impossible to ignore. Then, when the outbreak is brought under control, the pressure fades.
This matters in the middle of an active outbreak. Congo is dealing with a species of Ebola virus for which there is no approved vaccine or specific treatment. Ituri and nearby areas are also shaped by insecurity, displacement and cross-border movement. Uganda has already reported cases linked to the same outbreak, and neighbouring countries remain on alert.
Health systems across much of Africa remain underfunded, and outbreaks routinely stretch them beyond capacity. The international response that follows is almost always more expensive than what early investment would have required. Despite repeated promises after earlier crises, too little in that cycle has changed.
The people responding to Ebola in eastern Congo are not inexperienced. Congo's doctors, nurses and outbreak teams have dealt with repeated epidemics over the years, often in difficult conditions marked by insecurity and mistrust. But each new episode still arrives in a system that is thinly resourced and unevenly prepared.
Much of what determines how an outbreak unfolds is set long before the first case is confirmed. Laboratories must be functioning when samples arrive. Surveillance systems must be active when unusual clusters begin to appear. Cross-border coordination works best when it has already been agreed and tested, rather than negotiated under pressure.
Congo may yet bring this outbreak under control. It has done so before. But that cannot be the world's comfort. It should be its warning. A system that survives each outbreak by improvising is not prepared. It is lucky – until it is not.
Türkiye has banned children under 15 from using social media under new regulations published on Saturday. ...
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed surprise after Donald Trump mediated the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace agreement in 2025, the U.S. President ...
The United Nations has condemned a sharp rise in attacks on civilians in Ukraine, reporting that more than 100 people were killed and at least 429 ...
Leaders of countries from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) have agreed to hold coordinated population censuses around 2030. They took the decision at the CIS Council of Heads of State meeting in Awaza, Turkmenistan on Friday, media reported.
Britain and Israel have reached a temporary compromise over the future of the British Consulate General in East Jerusalem, easing a diplomatic dispute that had threatened to further strain relations between the two countries.
South African judge Navanethem “Navi” Pillay won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday “for her efforts to promote peace and international law,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee said.
The Nobel Peace Prize 2026 will be announced on Friday, 9 October, bringing one of the world's most closely watched awards back into focus.
The U.S. has imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Friday (9 October) escalating tensions with European allies and potentially targeting companies that provide services to the tribunal. The move came hours after former ICC judge Navi Pillay won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Tourism is traditionally one of the most sensitive sectors of any economy. Instability in the Middle East, the Russia–Ukraine war, and the emergence of AI as a transformative force are reshaping the industry in ways that could challenge how people travel, and the very future of tourism itself.
Azerbaijan has emerged as the leading power in the South Caucasus, and the South Caucasus region is itself increasing in significance in the Eastern Hemisphere. The region is an important connection between Asia and Europe, making Azerbaijan important beyond the South Caucasus.
The recent meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington was presented with all the symbolism of a major encounter between two global powers.
The recent disclosure that an artificial intelligence system developed by OpenAI gained unauthorised access to an Australian government healthcare database has exposed an uncomfortable reality about the direction of technological progress.
The opening debates of the 81st General Assembly exposed the distance between collective promises and enforceable decisions. The question is what the UN can deliver when the states with the power to act cannot agree.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment