Iran sends reply to U.S. peace plan as tensions persist in Strait of Hormuz
Iran said on Sunday (10 May) that it had sent its response to a U.S. proposal aimed at launching peace talks to end the war, as signs of tentative ...
The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
Moscow and Tehran - comprehensive strategic partners since October 2025 - appear to share a similar approach to warfare: harsh rhetoric paired with actions that contradict their claims and ultimately undermine their own strategic interests.
As a result, Russia and Iran frequently find themselves forced into unfavourable deals with their opponents that fail to deliver lasting peace, instead freezing conflicts only temporarily.
Iran’s modus operandi in its confrontation with the United States and Israel resembles that of Russia, which waged an indirect, proxy-style war in Ukraine’s Donbas region in 2014–2015.
At the time, following violent protests in Kyiv’s Maidan Square that led to the overthrow of the allegedly pro-Russian Ukrainian president, Viktor Yanukovych, the Ukrainian state was in serious crisis. Its military in the Donbas suffered heavy losses and was on the brink of collapse.
Yet Russian President Vladimir Putin did not use the situation to seize the entire region. Instead, he forced his proxies to sign the Minsk Agreements - documents that put the conflict “on hold” until it erupted again on 24 February 2022. The ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine is, therefore, a continuation of the Donbas war.
Iran appears to have followed a similar pattern after the 7 October attacks in Gaza. While Israel was preoccupied with the situation in the Gaza Strip, Tehran-backed Hezbollah did not take actions that would cause serious harm to the Israeli military.
Instead, it targeted antennas and surveillance equipment along the Lebanese–Israeli border. In the meantime, Israel was able to prosecute the Gaza conflict largely in its favour.
Only in late September 2024 did Hezbollah fire its first Qader-1 ballistic missile targeting Tel Aviv. But that was “too little and too late”, as Israel responded swiftly, destroying the group’s arsenal of cruise missiles, long- and short-range rockets, and attack drones. It ultimately killed Hezbollah’s entire military and political leadership, including Hassan Nasrallah, the organisation’s longtime Secretary-General.
Weakened by its leadership’s - and Tehran’s - failure to act in a timely and effective manner, the group was not even in a position to assist Iran during Israel’s 2025 airstrike campaign. Instead, Hezbollah remained largely silent as Israel conducted a series of strikes on the Islamic Republic.
Although the organisation later stepped in, joining forces with Tehran to attack Israel following the U.S.–Israeli campaign against Iran on 28 February, Hezbollah has once again found itself exposed.
While Israel, following a U.S.–Iran ceasefire deal, continued bombing Lebanon, the Islamic Republic issued harsh threats but did not launch strikes against its adversary.
Iran did not even risk targeting the two U.S. Navy ships that reportedly attempted to transit the Strait of Hormuz on 11 April, most likely fearing that such action would prompt Washington to resume its attacks. The difficulty, however, is that the United States may ultimately resume its campaign regardless.
Tehran remained committed to direct negotiations with the United States, despite Iranian leaders repeatedly stressing that they would hold no talks with Washington after a “very bad experience.” Throughout the conflict, Iran rejected U.S.-proposed ceasefire talks, insisting instead on a “permanent end to the war.”
Despite this rhetoric, as of 8 April 2026, the Islamic Republic accepted a conditional two-week ceasefire with the United States following mediation by Pakistan. Coincidentally or not, Russia adopted a similar approach in Ukraine.
While Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov claimed that Moscow “seeks not a ceasefire, but a sustainable, long-term peace”, Putin ordered a 32-hour ceasefire with Ukraine for the Orthodox Easter holiday, after which hostilities resumed.
Russia’s and Iran’s rhetoric does not align with their policy choices. Nevertheless, unlike Iran - which has firmly opposed talks with the U.S. following the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - the Kremlin has never closed the door to diplomacy.
Since 2022, Russian and Ukrainian representatives have met several times - in Minsk, Istanbul, Abu Dhabi and Geneva - holding multiple rounds of talks. However, none of these negotiations have led to a lasting peace.
Most recently, on 22 January, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, accompanied by Jared Kushner, travelled to Moscow to meet Putin. Although Witkoff described the talks as “productive,” no agreement was reached and hostilities in Ukraine continue.
Witkoff and Kushner, who were later appointed as top U.S. negotiators for talks with Iran, also failed to secure a deal after marathon negotiations in Islamabad on 11 April.
The U.S. and Israel, through airstrikes, have not achieved their stated objectives in Iran - from regime change in Tehran to curbing its nuclear ambitions, missile programme and regional influence. Aware of this, U.S. President Donald Trump warned that if negotiations in Islamabad fail, U.S. warships - reloaded with “the best ammunition” - would resume strikes on Iran.
Under current conditions, the most the United States has achieved is a Minsk-style ceasefire with Iran, allowing both sides to prepare for a potentially more destructive confrontation in the future.
Russia has similarly failed to secure its strategic objectives in Ukraine, including the “demilitarisation” and “denazification” of the country, recognition of its annexation of the Donbas, and Kyiv’s permanent neutrality. At the same time, Ukraine has been unable to restore its 1991 borders, which remain its ultimate war aim.
In these circumstances, the conflict may follow a familiar trajectory: a ceasefire that freezes the fighting while laying the groundwork for a renewed and potentially more destructive phase of war.
This appears to be a defining feature of both conflicts. They are periodically placed “on hold” while their underlying causes remain unresolved.
Efforts to end the U.S.-Iran war appeared to stall as the two sides exchanged fire in and around the Strait of Hormuz. A reported CIA assessment suggested Tehran could withstand a U.S. naval blockade for months despite mounting sanctions and renewed Gulf attacks.
British paratroopers and military medics have been deployed to Tristan da Cunha after a suspected hantavirus case was confirmed, as first evacuation flights carrying passengers from the stricken MV Hondius cruise ship left Tenerife for Madrid and Paris.
Russia is holding a significantly scaled-back Victory Day parade in Moscow on 9 May 2026, reflecting heightened security concerns and the ongoing war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year.
Indonesian rescue teams have located two Singaporeans who went missing after Mount Dukono erupted on Friday (8 May) on the island of Halmahera, though authorities say it remains unclear whether they are alive.
The U.S. Defense Department has released dozens of previously classified files on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) on Friday (8 May), following an order from President Donald Trump. U.S. officials described as a push for “unprecedented transparency”.
In a region where borders have long been drawn in blood rather than ink, even the act of sitting across the table carries strategic weight. The latest border talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan may appear procedural, but they carry profound geopolitical significance.
Hungarians put an end to the sixteen years of Viktor Orbán’s premiership on the night of 12 April when Fidesz - Orbán’s party - witnessed its largest and most bitter defeat in all of its history. In a matter of hours, 155 of the Hungarian parliament’s seats went to Tisza, Magyar’s party.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) exit by the United Arab Emirates has largely been viewed through a narrow economic lens: higher Emirati output, potential increases by Saudi Arabia and others to protect market share, and downward pressure on global prices.
The European Commission approved the deployment of a new mission to Armenia on 21 April that would share European experience in handling hybrid threats.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s latest statements have become a contested topic in Türkiye and beyond - less for what they intended to say than for what they inadvertently revealed.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment