The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
Starting a war is easy; ending one is far harder. The maxim, often attributed to Gabriel García Márquez, has held true in Ukraine. After four years of conflict, Russia has failed to achieve its strategic aims. Now the U.S. risks a similar outcome in Iran.
According to ancient Greek legend, when King Agamemnon set out to invade Troy, he expected a swift victory. Instead, the war dragged on for a decade. Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to have made a similar miscalculation in 2022, launching what he expected to be a rapid campaign in Ukraine. Rather than a “three-day” operation culminating in a military parade in Kyiv, Russia remains bogged down, with no clear end in sight.
When U.S. President Donald Trump ordered large-scale strikes on Iran on 28 February, early assessments suggested the conflict might last only days. Soon after, American officials extended that estimate to several weeks. Now, with Trump’s blitzkrieg-style regime-change effort faltering, the U.S. appears entangled in what many already describe as another “endless war”.
One of the central flaws in a regime-change strategy is that it is unlikely to succeed during active conflict. The killing of political leaders rarely produces systemic change. More often, it consolidates internal unity and strengthens support for the existing regime. In Iran, any transition aligned with U.S. and Israeli interests is more likely to emerge after hostilities cease, or during a ceasefire, rather than in the midst of war.
More troubling for U.S. policymakers is the likelihood that Washington’s core objectives in Iran are unattainable. Weakening the Islamic Republic’s military, curbing its support for regional proxies, and dismantling its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes would require months, if not years, of sustained operations.
Yet precedent offers little encouragement. Years of U.S., Israeli and Saudi airstrikes against Iran-backed Houthi forces in Yemen neither produced regime change in Sana’a nor significantly degraded their military capabilities. Without troops on the ground in Tehran - or a highly improbable internal uprising - the U.S. and Israel are unlikely to achieve their full strategic aims.
The Kremlin appears to have learned this lesson in Ukraine. Putin’s initial objectives - including the “demilitarisation” and “denazification” of Ukraine, recognition of Moscow’s annexation of the Donbas, and Ukraine’s permanent neutrality - would have required control of Kyiv and the installation of a compliant government.
By the spring of 2022, it had become evident that Russia lacked the capacity to secure these goals. Since then, Moscow has quietly narrowed its ambitions, focusing largely on territorial gains in the Donbas. U.S. officials appear to be following a similar pattern, repeatedly redefining their objectives in Iran.
Trump, however, has continued to issue forceful warnings to Tehran. Putin adopted a comparable strategy in Ukraine. Yet repeated threats that go unfulfilled risk eroding credibility. Russia has already reached a point where its warnings carry diminished weight.
The U.S. could face a similar trajectory. Iran, like Ukraine, has demonstrated a willingness to endure a prolonged conflict, even at the cost of widespread destruction, humanitarian crisis and environmental damage.
Washington must also contend with the stance of its allies. While many have expressed nominal support for U.S. strikes, few have participated directly in military operations. Moreover, the U.S. has struggled to guarantee the security of Gulf states against Iranian retaliation, raising concerns about long-term trust.
Russia’s position is even more precarious, with only Belarus and North Korea offering tangible support for its war in Ukraine. Although the U.S., as a global hegemon, is unlikely to experience a comparable collapse in alliances, its actions in Iran may nonetheless erode credibility - particularly in the Middle East and, increasingly, in Europe.
Despite the parallels, the U.S. remains far better positioned than Russia militarily, politically and economically. Even so, failure in Iran could carry domestic political consequences, potentially costing Republicans control in the midterm elections.
For Russia, the stakes are even higher: a decisive defeat in Ukraine could trigger systemic instability and raise questions about the future integrity of the Russian Federation.
Even if Moscow and Washington ultimately prevail in Ukraine and Iran, such victories are likely to be Pyrrhic. Both Kyiv and Tehran have proved more resilient than many anticipated - a reminder that military power alone rarely delivers decisive political outcomes.
Iran temporarily reopened the Strait of Hormuz on Friday (17 April) following a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, ra...
Australia and Japan signed contracts on Saturday (18 April) launching their landmark A$10 billion ($7 billion) dea...
Global shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has shown signs of partial recovery after Iran announced it was open to commercial vessels during a li...
Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping on Friday (17 April) for the first time since the U.S. and Israel killed Iran's ex-Su...
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has said his country could provide a “safe corridor” and “alternative route” for regional ...
The past 24 hours of the Russia-Ukraine war have seen a drastic escalation in both aerial bombardment and frontline losses.
Russia published addresses of manufacturers allegedly producing drones or components for Ukraine on Wednesday (15 April), warning European countries against plans to step up UAV supplies to Kyiv.
Finance leaders from the Group of Seven (G7) have indicated they are prepared to step in if needed, to shield the global economy from the fallout of the war involving Iran, as concerns grow over rising energy prices and supply disruptions.
Russia unleashed missile and drone attacks on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv and other cities overnight, killing 13 people, including a 12-year-old child, injuring several dozens and badly damaging buildings, officials said on Thursday.
The past 24 hours of the Russia-Ukraine war have seen a drastic escalation in both aerial bombardment and frontline losses.
Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping on Friday (17 April) for the first time since the U.S. and Israel killed Iran's ex-Supreme Leader in air strikes, triggering the Middle East conflict, at the end of February. A U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, however, remains in force.
Russia published addresses of manufacturers allegedly producing drones or components for Ukraine on Wednesday (15 April), warning European countries against plans to step up UAV supplies to Kyiv.
Netflix shares fell sharply on Friday after the streaming group issued a weaker-than-expected outlook and said chairman and co-founder Reed Hastings will step down from the board.
U.S. President Donald Trump says Israeli and Lebanese leaders have agreed to a 10-day ceasefire that includes Hezbollah, raising cautious hopes of a pause in hostilities after weeks of escalating tensions.
The current Middle East crisis has already had profound macroeconomic and energy consequences. It also reflects a broader phase of globalisation, where interdependencies can be weaponised for geopolitical purposes.
The collapse of the Islamabad meeting now appears less definitive than initially reported. New information suggests what was widely framed as failure may instead have been a premature political interpretation of an ongoing negotiation process.
Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Economy signed a Memorandum of Understanding on 10 March with Haimaker.AI Inc., a U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) technology company, to develop a next-generation digital platform and ecosystem.
There are moments in history when energy ceases to be merely an economic commodity and becomes a defining pillar of geopolitical order. We are living through one such moment.
At a time of deepening global polarisation, rising conflict and shrinking space for dialogue, Pakistan is stepping into a historic role. Diplomatic engagements in Islamabad, bringing together regional powers amid the Iran crisis, signal both urgency and opportunity.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment