live Iran closes Strait of Hormuz again over U.S. blockade, state media says- Saturday 18 April
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said in a Saturday statement that the Strait of Hormuz has...
The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
The real power of the Strait of Hormuz lies not in closing it, but in the threat of closure.
Few places illustrate the geopolitical vulnerability of the modern economy more starkly than this narrow stretch of water between Iran and Oman. At its narrowest point the strait is barely 20 miles wide. Yet roughly 20 million barrels of oil pass through it each day - close to one-fifth of global supply.
When that artery tightens, the world notices quickly.
Recent tensions in the Gulf have already demonstrated the system’s sensitivity. Shipping companies grow cautious. Tanker insurance premiums climb. Oil markets twitch. Prices rise long before the flow of crude actually stops.
In Hormuz, perception alone can disrupt trade.
The geography helps explain why. The shipping lanes themselves are only a few miles across. A handful of mines, drones or missile threats can make insurers nervous and shipowners hesitant. A formal blockade is unnecessary. Risk alone can slow the global energy trade.
Yet the most interesting strategic feature of Hormuz lies not in the waterway itself, but in who depends on it.
For all the attention paid to U.S. naval patrols in the Gulf, most of the oil passing through the strait does not end up in the United States. It sails east. China, India, Japan and South Korea absorb the majority of Gulf exports. Europe - still wary after years of energy disruption - also watches the route closely.
This creates an awkward asymmetry.
A severe disruption in Hormuz would rattle global oil markets and push prices higher everywhere, including in the United States. But the economies most physically dependent on the route lie elsewhere. The factories of East Asia and the industrial engines of Europe would feel the shock most directly.
In geopolitics, such asymmetries matter.
Should Hormuz become unstable, the crisis would quickly outgrow its regional origins. What begins as tension between rival powers in the Gulf could soon command the attention of energy-hungry economies far beyond it. Japan would worry about fuel supplies. European governments about industrial output. Gulf producers about their export lifeline. Asian importers about keeping tankers moving.
The problem would cease to be regional. It would become global.
This is the diplomatic multiplier built into the strait. Disruptions there do not simply inconvenience one adversary. They unsettle the entire economic system.
And that carries political consequences.
Closing or severely obstructing one of the world’s most important maritime corridors risks transforming a geopolitical dispute into something far more uncomfortable: a perceived threat to global commerce. The narrative shifts. A regional confrontation begins to resemble a challenge to the stability of the international trading system.
That perception rarely attracts sympathy.
Yet the logic cuts both ways. A prolonged shutdown of Hormuz would not merely punish rivals. It would shake the global economy itself. Energy markets are interconnected and sustained supply shocks have a habit of producing inflation, economic slowdown and political turbulence across multiple continents.
No major power, including the United States, has much appetite for that outcome.
Which is why the strategic logic of Hormuz is so peculiar. Its value lies not in permanent closure, but in the credible possibility of disruption. The mere suggestion that the artery might tighten can send oil traders scrambling, diplomats negotiating and navies repositioning.
In that sense, the strait functions less like a locked gate than a lever.
Pull it slightly and markets tremble. Pull it harder and alliances shift. Pull it too far and the entire system risks seizing up.
The Strait of Hormuz has long been one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical fault lines. Geography has placed a critical energy artery in a region where strategic rivalries run deep.
Its power lies not simply in what it can stop, but in what the world fears it might stop.
The past 24 hours of the Russia-Ukraine war have seen a drastic escalation in both aerial bombardment and frontline losses.
Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping on Friday (17 April) for the first time since the U.S. and Israel killed Iran's ex-Supreme Leader in air strikes, triggering the Middle East conflict, at the end of February. A U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, however, remains in force.
Russia published addresses of manufacturers allegedly producing drones or components for Ukraine on Wednesday (15 April), warning European countries against plans to step up UAV supplies to Kyiv.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said in a Saturday statement that the Strait of Hormuz has returned to its "previous state" under the control of its "armed forces," citing the ongoing U.S. blockade on Iranian ports.
Netflix shares fell sharply on Friday after the streaming group issued a weaker-than-expected outlook and said chairman and co-founder Reed Hastings will step down from the board.
The current Middle East crisis has already had profound macroeconomic and energy consequences. It also reflects a broader phase of globalisation, where interdependencies can be weaponised for geopolitical purposes.
The collapse of the Islamabad meeting now appears less definitive than initially reported. New information suggests what was widely framed as failure may instead have been a premature political interpretation of an ongoing negotiation process.
Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Economy signed a Memorandum of Understanding on 10 March with Haimaker.AI Inc., a U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) technology company, to develop a next-generation digital platform and ecosystem.
There are moments in history when energy ceases to be merely an economic commodity and becomes a defining pillar of geopolitical order. We are living through one such moment.
At a time of deepening global polarisation, rising conflict and shrinking space for dialogue, Pakistan is stepping into a historic role. Diplomatic engagements in Islamabad, bringing together regional powers amid the Iran crisis, signal both urgency and opportunity.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment