The AnewZ Opinion section provides a platform for independent voices to share expert perspectives on global and regional issues. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AnewZ
The economic consequences of war rarely remain confined to the battlefield. They ripple through markets, supply chains and investor confidence. For Türkiye, at the crossroads of Europe, the Middle East and Eurasia, the economic shockwaves from the latest Middle East crisis are already being felt.
Oil prices have surged sharply. On Monday, Brent crude approached $120 per barrel, and if the conflict continues beyond this month, some market scenarios suggest prices could climb towards $150. For energy-importing economies, this is not merely a price increase; it is a macroeconomic shock.
Few countries feel that shock as quickly as Türkiye.
Türkiye imports nearly 90% of its oil and about 98% of its natural gas. As a result, energy price spikes immediately translate into higher import bills, inflationary pressure and strain on the current account balance.
A prolonged period of oil prices above $120 per barrel would significantly complicate Türkiye’s ongoing economic stabilisation efforts.
Historically, each $10 increase in oil prices adds roughly $4–5 billion to Türkiye’s annual energy import bill. If oil moves towards $150, the additional burden could easily exceed $20–25 billion over the course of a year.
This would widen the current account deficit and place renewed pressure on the Turkish lira.
Türkiye has a mechanism designed to cushion consumers against sudden fuel price increases: the “eşel mobil” system, under which the government progressively reduces the ÖTV (Special Consumption Tax) on fuel as global oil prices rise. This allows pump prices to remain relatively stable in the short term. However, the system has limits.
When oil prices surge beyond certain thresholds, the tax reduction eventually reaches zero, leaving no fiscal buffer to absorb further increases.
With Brent already nearing $120, Türkiye may soon reach that point. If prices climb towards $135–150, the government will have little room left to stabilise fuel prices through tax adjustments.
At that stage, policymakers may need to consider additional measures, ranging from fiscal support mechanisms to targeted subsidies or demand-management policies.
One potential short-term response involves the coordinated release of strategic petroleum reserves.
Türkiye, as a member of the International Energy Agency (IEA) emergency response system, participates in a collective mechanism through which 32 member countries can release oil stocks during supply disruptions.
Such coordinated releases are designed to:
However, strategic reserves are not a long-term solution. They buy time, but they do not resolve the underlying geopolitical tensions driving the crisis.
Beyond energy prices, the war could also influence investor sentiment.
Global investors often react quickly to geopolitical risk. Even if Türkiye itself is not directly involved in the conflict, the perception that it lies within a broader conflict zone can lead to:
Financial markets tend to price in uncertainty quickly. In such moments, economic credibility and policy predictability become critical to maintaining investor confidence.
Tourism represents another area of vulnerability. Türkiye has become one of the world’s leading tourist destinations, welcoming more than 55 million visitors annually and generating over $50 billion in revenue. Yet tourism is highly sensitive to perceptions of security.
Even if Türkiye remains entirely safe, international media coverage of war in the region can create a broader sense of instability across the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East.
If that perception takes hold, it could affect summer tourism arrivals, particularly from European markets.
Despite these risks, crises can sometimes create unexpected economic opportunities.
As uncertainty rises in parts of the Gulf — particularly in Dubai, Qatar and Saudi Arabia — some businesses and investors may begin looking for alternative regional bases.
Türkiye — thanks to its large domestic market, diversified economy and relatively strong infrastructure — could be perceived as a comparatively stable safe haven.
In recent years, Türkiye has already attracted:
If geopolitical tensions persist in the Gulf, Türkiye could potentially see new investment inflows in finance, trade and logistics.
For Ankara, the challenge lies in managing both the risks and the opportunities created by the crisis.
Three strategic priorities stand out.
First, accelerating energy diversification.
Renewables, nuclear power, domestic gas production and energy efficiency must reduce Türkiye’s dependence on imported hydrocarbons.
Second, maintaining macroeconomic credibility.
In times of global uncertainty, stable and predictable economic policies are essential to preserve investor confidence.
Third, leveraging Türkiye’s geographic advantage.
As global supply chains and energy routes shift, Türkiye has the potential to strengthen its role as a regional energy hub and logistics corridor.
Wars rarely remain confined to the countries that fight them.
For Türkiye, the Middle East crisis will likely bring higher energy costs, economic volatility and geopolitical risk. Yet it may also open new economic opportunities if managed strategically.
The key question is not whether Türkiye will feel the economic consequences of this war — it already does. The real question is whether Türkiye can navigate the turbulence wisely enough to emerge stronger on the other side.
Around 5,000 people have been evacuated to safety after a magnitude-7.7 earthquake smashed an area in eastern Indo...
Twelve people have died and at least 10 others were injured after a Polish-registered bus overturned on a motorway in eastern Hungary, officials sa...
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un reaffirmed the deepening of ties with Russia in a message to President Vladimir Pu...
Wildfires across England and Wales have reached their highest level on record, according to the National Fire Chiefs Council, as firefighters struggle to contain outbreaks following a spell of extreme heat.
The U.S. will impose unprecedented measures on Iran in order to economically isolate the country, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said.
U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to make the Strait of Hormuz part of U.S. territory have been mocked by Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, who said the sea passage "cannot be seized by tweet."
At least 47 people have been killed after a magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck off eastern Indonesia early on Saturday, triggering small tsunami waves and dozens of aftershocks, officials say.
Iran says the U.S. war and military presence in the region have worsened marine pollution around the Strait of Hormuz, calling for environmental protection to form part of future arrangements governing the strategic waterway.
When the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) celebrated its 59th anniversary on August 8 in Indonesia’s capital, Jakarta, the occasion offered more than an opportunity to reflect on nearly six decades of regional integration.
Disruption in the Strait of Hormuz has increased the strategic importance of Bab al-Mandab, raising fears that instability in both waterways could trigger a wider global energy and trade crisis.
On 23 August, Kazakhstan will vote for the Kurultai, a new 145-seat, single-chamber parliament replacing the two-chamber system the country has had since independence.
One hundred years after the First World War and more than eighty years after the devastation of the Second World War gave rise to the United Nations, humanity once again finds itself living in an age of permanent crisis.
A year after the Washington agreements, TRIPP is emerging as more than a transport project, reshaping regional connectivity, security calculations and the balance of influence across the South Caucasus.
You can download the AnewZ application from Play Store and the App Store.
What is your opinion on this topic?
Leave the first comment