Israeli strike in Beirut kills Hezbollah commander, straining fragile ceasefire

A senior commander in Hezbollah’s elite Radwan force was killed in an Israeli airstrike in Beirut on Wednesday (6 May), highlighting ongoing tensions despite a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz confirmed the strike in a joint statement, underscoring the volatility of the current truce.

Speaking to AnewZ, Liberum editor-in-chief Arthur Blok said repeated exchanges of fire show the ceasefire is “in name only,” arguing Hezbollah has limited incentive to commit to a lasting agreement while maintaining its armed role.

“Hezbollah actually resists a ceasefire because its raison d’être is fighting,” Blok said, describing the group’s military function as central to its political identity.

“If there’s peace, then they become obsolete.”

His comments came after Israel said Hezbollah launched several rockets towards Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, prompting retaliatory strikes on multiple Hezbollah-linked positions, including weapons depots.

Lebanese state media reported Israeli shelling and airstrikes in several southern towns overnight.t.

Despite a U.S.-brokered ceasefire announced on 16 April, hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah have continued intermittently, with both sides accusing each other of violations.  

Reports indicate Hezbollah has faced mounting pressure in Lebanon in recent months, including criticism from some political factions over its continued armed status, though claims of large-scale battlefield losses remain difficult to independently verify.

Vital diplomacy

Blok argued that Lebanon’s political leadership increasingly views diplomacy, rather than military escalation, as the only viable path forward.

“You cannot solve a conflict on the battlefield. You have to talk, sit and talk,” he said.

Lebanon’s government has recently engaged in indirect contacts with Israel under United States mediation, a move Hezbollah strongly opposes.

International reporting suggests Beirut sees Washington as the only external actor with sufficient leverage to help secure a more durable ceasefire and address disputed areas along the southern border.

At the centre of the dispute is Hezbollah’s refusal to disarm.

The group has repeatedly rejected calls from Israel and some Lebanese political factions to surrender its weapons, maintaining that armed resistance remains necessary while Israeli forces are active near or within Lebanese territory.

Blok said Hezbollah’s alignment with Iran complicates stabilisation efforts.

“Because of Iran, who was basically deciding the rules for Hezbollah, and saying what they can and cannot do and can say, they limited Lebanon’s ability as a country to engage with Israel,” he said.

Lebanon’s future

Blok suggested developments in Lebanon are increasingly linked to wider negotiations between Washington and Tehran over Iran’s nuclear programme and regional security.

On Wednesday, U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington and Tehran had held “very good talks” over the past 24 hours and indicated a deal remained possible, although Iranian officials have continued to send mixed signals.

Blok said internal divisions within Iran’s leadership may be contributing to the uncertainty.

“The president of Iran wants a diplomatic solution, but the Revolutionary Guard wants to continue fighting,” he said.

“The path of war is not feasible for both parties.”

Despite ongoing violence, Blok said he still expects “some kind of breakthrough in the near future”, while cautioning that any diplomatic progress is unlikely to immediately stabilise Lebanon or the wider region.

Read more:

Tags