U.S.-Iran diplomacy gains momentum despite ‘strategic mistake’

U.S.-Iran diplomacy is gaining momentum after weeks of military escalation, but tensions remain high from the Strait of Hormuz to Lebanon. Analysts say simultaneous negotiations and military pressure reflect a broader regional struggle that is far from over.

Speaking on AnewZ, Middle East researcher Bassel Doueik from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) said reports of an imminent agreement should be treated cautiously, noting that similar claims have surfaced repeatedly.

“Well, I think this is the ninth time that Axios says that an imminent deal between Iran and the U.S. is there and that the Iranian and American negotiators are coming to a point that can actually bring them together,” Doueik said.

He also suggested that financial interests may be influencing developments behind the scenes.

“A lot of people were selling short the crude oil that made them a lot of money 70 minutes before the Axios report came out,” Doueik stated.

'The war against Iran was a strategic mistake'

Doueik argued that the Trump administration underestimated Iran’s military capabilities at the start of the conflict and wrongly expected Tehran to collapse quickly under pressure.

“It only needs 100 hours, and the IRGC will collapse. And that was not the case. Iran is more of a formidable force. It has been able to attack Gulf states. It has been able to attack Israel,” he said.

According to Doueik, the conflict has created growing political and economic pressure on Washington, including rising fuel prices and domestic political concerns ahead of elections.

The analyst described Pakistan as a key intermediary between Tehran and Washington, as distrust remains high between both sides.

However, he noted that some Iranian hardliners remain sceptical of Islamabad’s role, believing Pakistan may be buying time for further U.S. military action rather than facilitating a genuine breakthrough.

'We can go back to fighting'

Despite renewed diplomatic activity, military threats and escalation continue across the region.

Doueik said this reflects a broader pressure strategy by Washington rather than a contradiction between diplomacy and conflict.

“The U.S. is telling Iran that we can go back to fighting. We can bomb you. We can wipe out your power plants,” he said.

“But we also have another option, and that option is if you come to the table.”

He added that the United States continues to demand restrictions on Iran’s nuclear enrichment and ballistic missile programme, conditions Tehran is unlikely to fully accept.

Strait of Hormuz remains at the centre

Doueik said the Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most critical unresolved issues in any future agreement.

Bulk Carrier 'Adventure' at the Port of Fujairah, as the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran limits marine traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, 6 May, 2026.
Reuters

He added that Gulf countries are divided in how they view the conflict. While Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait are focused on ending instability because of threats to energy exports and trade, the United Arab Emirates remains more closely aligned with Israel’s broader objective of weakening Iran’s leadership and the IRGC.

Doueik also warned that even if Washington and Tehran move towards de-escalation, instability across the wider region is likely to continue, particularly in Lebanon.

Tags